Citation network
United States Vs. Maze
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 08, 1974
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 395 (1974) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. MazeSearch
-
U.S. 395 (1974) United States v. MazeSearch
-
when respondent checked out of the motel, and did not depend on which of his victims ultimately bore the loss. Pereira v. UnitedSearch
-
In Pereira v. UnitedSearch
-
Kann v. UnitedSearch
-
Pereira v. UnitedSearch
-
States, supra, at 347 U. S. 8 . The Government relies on Pereira, supra, and United States v. SampsonSearch
-
U. S. 75 (1962), to support its position, while respondent relies on Kann v. UnitedSearch
-
States, supra, and Parr v. UnitedSearch
-
misplaced by the various motel personnel and never mailed at all. The Government, however, relying on United States v. SampsonSearch
-
should also consider the mail fraud convictions as well. There is no jurisdictional barrier to such a decision, Benton v. MarylandSearch
-
The decision of the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in United States v. LynnSearch
-
Sixth Circuit in the instant case. Five other courts of appeals apparently take a contrary view. E.g., United States v. KellermanSearch
-
United States v. ChasonSearch
-
United States v. MadisonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
United States v. CiottiSearch
-
Adams v. UnitedSearch
-
Kloian v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. ThomasSearch
-
United States v. KelemSearch
-
sole vehicle for the federal prosecution of credit card frauds. Brief for United States 33-37, citing United States v. BeaconSearch
-
Id. at 534, quoting Kann v. UnitedSearch
-
Therefore, only if the mailings were 'a part of the execution of the fraud,' or, as we said in Pereira v. UnitedSearch
-
Parr v. UnitedSearch
-
fraud that necessarily results from the time-consuming processing of credit card invoices by mail. See United States v. ChasonSearch
-
States, supra, at 323 U. S. 94 -95. See United States v. HendricksonSearch
-
United States v. RiedelSearch
-
United States v. LoweSearch
-
In United States v. SampsonSearch
-
United States v. KellySearch
-
United States v. KellermanSearch
-
Adam v. UnitedSearch
-
the court below. Ante at 414 U. S. 398 n. 2. The Court of Appeals in this case relied upon United States v. LynnSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. MazeSearch
-
and United States v. SampsonSearch
-
and Parr v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. LynnSearch
-
E.g., United States v. KellermanSearch
-
United States v. BeaconSearch
-
See United States v. ChasonSearch
-
See United States v. HendricksonSearch
-
United States v. SampsonSearch
-
United States v. ReynoldsSearch
-
United States v. KellySearch
-
Benton v. MarylandSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial