Citation network
Gateway Coal Vs. Umw
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 08, 1974
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 368 (1974) U.S. Supreme Court Gateway Coal v. UMWSearch
-
U.S. 368 (1974) Gateway Coal v. UnitedSearch
-
interpretation that covers the asserted dispute, and doubts should be resolved in favor of coverage), Steelworkers v. AmericanSearch
-
Steelworkers v. WarriorSearch
-
Steelworkers v. EnterpriseSearch
-
satisfy the traditional equitable considerations controlling the availability of injunctive relief, Boys Markets, Inc. v. RetailSearch
-
case was appropriate under the traditional considerations of equity set forth by this Court in Boys Markets, Inc. v. PageSearch
-
United Steelworkers of America v. WarriorSearch
-
stoppage. The answer depends on whether the union was under a contractual duty not to strike. In Boys Markets, Inc. v. RetailSearch
-
injunctive relief also may be granted on the basis of an implied undertaking not to strike. In Teamsters Local v. LucasSearch
-
consistent both with common sense and with its previous application. See, e.g., Philadelphia Marine Trade Assn. v. NLRBSearch
-
F.2d 492 (CA3), cert. denied sub nom. International Longshoremen's Assn. v. NLRBSearch
-
NLRB v. Fruin-ColnonSearch
-
NLRB v. KnightSearch
-
Redwing Carriers, Inc., 130 N.L.R.B. 1208 (1961), enf'd as modified sub nom. Teamsters Local 79 v. NLRBSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
injunctive relief was appropriate in the present case under the equitable principles set forth in Boys Markets, Inc. v. RetailSearch
-
United Steelworkers of America v. AmericanSearch
-
United Steelworkers of America v. EnterpriseSearch
-
which had to be resolved against arbitrability. However, as the Court stated in United Steelworker of America v. WarriorSearch
-
the availability of injunctive relief, however, are equally compelling. As the Court stated in Boys Markets, Inc. v. RetailSearch
-
agreement makes arbitration the exclusive and compulsory means for finally resolving disputes. Under Teamsters Local v. LucasSearch
-
duty. We do not think that Paragraph 1 can be fairly construed as an exception to that no-strike duty. Cf. Lewis v. BenedictSearch
-
Coal Corp., 259 F.2d 346 (CA6 1958) (Stewart, J.), affirmed by an equally divided Court sub nom. Mine Workers v. BenedictSearch
-
in the agreement here in question, is broadly construed. Steelworkers trilogy ( United Steelworkers of America v. PageSearch
-
a dispute is determined to be arbitrable, there is an implied agreement by the union not to strike, Teamsters Local v. LucasSearch
-
S. 95 , which is enforceable by a federal court injunction under the principles enunciated in Boys Markets, Inc. v. RetailSearch
-
Textile Workers v. LincolnSearch
-
all agreements to arbitrate safety conditions. It is in that respect a more extreme case than U.S. Bulk Carriers v. ArguellesSearch
-
known as the Krug-Lewis agreement, and arising from President Truman's seizure of the mines in 1946, United States v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Gateway Coal v. UMWSearch
-
Gateway Coal v. UnitedSearch
-
Steelworkers v. AmericanSearch
-
Boys Markets, Inc. v. RetailSearch
-
Boys Markets, Inc. v. PageSearch
-
In Boys Markets, Inc. v. RetailSearch
-
In Teamsters Local v. LucasSearch
-
Philadelphia Marine Trade Assn. v. NLRBSearch
-
International Longshoremen's Assn. v. NLRBSearch
-
United Steelworker of America v. WarriorSearch
-
Under Teamsters Local v. LucasSearch
-
Cf. Lewis v. BenedictSearch
-
Mine Workers v. BenedictSearch
-
United Steelworkers of America v. PageSearch
-
Teamsters Local v. LucasSearch
-
U.S. Bulk Carriers v. ArguellesSearch
-
United States v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial