Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

United States Vs. Calandra

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 08, 1974

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

66 entries 7 linked 59 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Bryan US Supreme Court · May 08, 1950
  2. Mapp Vs. Ohio US Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1961
  3. Linkletter Vs. Walker US Supreme Court · Jun 07, 1965
  4. Terry Vs. Ohio US Supreme Court · Jun 10, 1968
  5. United States Vs. Dionisio US Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1973
  6. Hale Vs. Henkel US Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1906
  7. Branzburg Vs. Hayes US Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1972
  8. U.S. 338 (1974) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Calandra
    Search
  9. U.S. 338 (1974) United States v. Calandra
    Search
  10. Cf. Costello v. United
    Search
  11. believe a crime has been committed and the protection of citizens against unfounded criminal prosecutions. Branzburg v. Hayes
    Search
  12. Blair v. United
    Search
  13. grand jury's investigative power must be broad if its public responsibility is adequately to be discharged. Branzburg v. Hayes
    Search
  14. Costello v. United
    Search
  15. into a general problem area . . . , society's interest is best served by a thorough and extensive investigation.' Wood v. Georgia
    Search
  16. has been run down and all witnesses examined in every proper way to find if a crime has been committed.' United States v. Stone
    Search
  17. by tips, rumors, evidence proffered by the prosecutor, or the personal knowledge of the grand jurors. Costello v. United
    Search
  18. to challenge on the ground that the grand jury acted on the basis of inadequate or incompetent evidence, Costello v. United
    Search
  19. Holt v. United
    Search
  20. basis of information obtained in violation of a defendant's Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, Lawn v. United
    Search
  21. of a federal court to compel persons to appear and testify before a grand jury is also firmly established. Kastigar v. United
    Search
  22. The duty to testify has long been recognized as a basic obligation that every citizen owes his Government. Blackmer v. United
    Search
  23. U. S. 323 , 339 U. S. 331 (1950). In Branzburg v. Hayes
    Search
  24. the witness' personal interest in privacy must yield to the public's overriding interest in full disclosure. Blair v. United
    Search
  25. not itself violate a valid privilege, whether established by the Constitution, statutes, or the common law. Branzburg v. Hayes
    Search
  26. Blackmer v. United
    Search
  27. based on evidence obtained in violation of a defendant's Fifth Amendment privilege is nevertheless valid, Lawn v. United
    Search
  28. claim only if the witness is granted immunity coextensive with the privilege against self-incrimination. Kastigar v. United
    Search
  29. supra. Similarly, a grand jury may not compel a person to produce books and papers that would incriminate him. Boyd v. United
    Search
  30. States, 116 U. S. 616 , 116 U. S. 633 -635 (1886). Cf. Couch v. United
    Search
  31. under the Fourth Amendment. Hale v. Henkel
    Search
  32. Fourth Amendment cannot be used in a criminal proceeding against the victim of the illegal search and seizure. Weeks v. United
    Search
  33. U. S. 643 (1961). This prohibition applies as well to the fruits of the illegally seized evidence. Wong Sun v. United
    Search
  34. Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United
    Search
  35. Elkins v. United
    Search
  36. States, 364 U. S. 206 , 364 U. S. 217 (1960). Page 414 U. S. 348 Accord, Mapp v. Ohio
    Search
  37. Tehan v. Schott
    Search
  38. to situations where the Government seeks to use such evidence to incriminate the victim of the unlawful search. Brown v. United
    Search
  39. Alderman v. United
    Search
  40. Won Sun v. United
    Search
  41. Jones v. United
    Search
  42. Gelbard v. United
    Search
  43. U. S. 1 , 410 U. S. 17 (1973). Cf. United States v. Ryan
    Search
  44. Cobbledick v. United
    Search
  45. follow that the Fourth Amendment requires adoption of every proposal that might deter police misconduct. In Alderman v. United
    Search
  46. Page 414 U. S. 353 v. Respondent
    Search
  47. that his responses might prove embarrassing or result in an unwelcome disclosure of his personal affairs. Blair v. United
    Search
  48. For a discussion of the history and role of the grand jury, see Costello v. United
    Search
  49. The grand jury is subject to the court's supervision in several respects. See Brown v. United
    Search
  50. U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Calandra
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial