Citation network
O'Shea Vs. Littleton
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 15, 1974
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U.S. 488 (1974) U.S. Supreme Court O'Shea v. LittletonSearch
-
U.S. 488 (1974) O'Shea v. LittletonSearch
-
of state criminal proceedings, and would sharply conflict with recognized principles of equitable restraint, Younger v. HarrisSearch
-
with respect to acts done in the course of their judicial duties. The Court of Appeals reversed, holding that Pierson v. RaySearch
-
that those who seek to invoke the power of federal courts must allege an actual case or controversy. Flast v. CohenSearch
-
Linda R.S. v. RichardSearch
-
U. S. 204 (1962). Nor is the principle different where statutory issues are raised. Cf. United States v. SCRAPSearch
-
as the result of the challenged statute or official conduct. Massachusetts v. MellonSearch
-
Maryland Casualty Co. v. PacificSearch
-
Indiana Employment Division v. BurneySearch
-
the complaint would inappropriately be seeking relief from or modification of current, existing custody. See Preiser v. RodriguezSearch
-
state proceedings, the complaint would be seeking injunctive relief that a federal court should not provide. Younger v. HarrisSearch
-
and will be made to appear before either petitioner takes us into the area of speculation and conjecture. See Younger v. HarrisSearch
-
as well as exposure to the challenged course of conduct said to be followed by petitioners. As in Golden v. ZwicklerSearch
-
that unconstitutional criminal statutes are being employed to deter constitutionally protected conduct. Cf. Perez v. LedesmaSearch
-
too remote to satisfy the case or controversy requirement and permit adjudication by a federal court. In Boyle v. LandrySearch
-
Id. at 401 U. S. 46 . See, e.g., Fenner v. BoykinSearch
-
Douglas v. CitySearch
-
federal audit of state criminal proceedings which would indirectly accomplish the kind of interference that Younger v. HarrisSearch
-
Cleary v. BolgerSearch
-
Rea v. UnitedSearch
-
of the operation of state court functions that is antipathetic to established principles of comity. Cf. Greenwood v. PeacockSearch
-
See Greenwood v. PeacockSearch
-
Screws v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 299 (1941). Cf. Monroe v. PapeSearch
-
Whatever may be the case with respect to civil liability generally, see Pierson v. RaySearch
-
U. S. 547 (1967), or civil liability for willful corruption, see Alzua v. JohnsonSearch
-
Gravel v. UnitedSearch
-
the invasion of which creates standing, even though no injury would exist without the statute. See, e.g., Trafficante v. MetropolitanSearch
-
Harding v. KentuckySearch
-
relief in equity even when recognizing that comparable facts would create a cause of action for damages. Compare Giles v. HarrisSearch
-
U. S. 475 , with Lane v. WilsonSearch
-
United States v. EvansSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial