Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Sampson Vs. Murray

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Feb 19, 1974

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

65 entries 4 linked 61 unlinked
Show
  1. Cafeteria Workers Vs. Mcelroy US Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1961
  2. Beacon theatres, Inc. Vs. Westover US Supreme Court · May 25, 1959
  3. Service Vs. Dulles US Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1957
  4. Wieman Vs. Updegraff US Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1952
  5. U.S. 61 (1974) U.S. Supreme Court Sampson v. Murray
    Search
  6. U.S. 61 (1974) Sampson v. Murray
    Search
  7. be sustained. Pp. 415 U. S. 68 -92. (a) The District Court's authority to review agency action, Service v. Dulles
    Search
  8. nor authorized -- the mandatory reinstatement of respondent in her Government position. Scripps-Howard Radio v. FCC
    Search
  9. FTC v. Dean
    Search
  10. in this particular case was within the permissible bounds of its discretion. We granted certiorari sub nom. Kunzi v. Murray
    Search
  11. in disputes about governmental employment, we think this assumption of the Court of Appeals is wrong. In Keim v. United
    Search
  12. In White v. Berry
    Search
  13. employees, and not because of them. Much water has flowed over the dam since 1898, and cases such as Service v. Dulles
    Search
  14. fact that Government personnel decision are now ultimately subject to the type of judicial review sought in Service v. Dulles
    Search
  15. without more, create the authority to issue interim injunctive relief which was held lacking in cases such as White v. Berry
    Search
  16. of Appeals found support for its affirmance of the District Court's grant of injunctive relief in Scripps-Howard Radio v. FCC
    Search
  17. of course, is not the instant case. The authority of the District Court to review agency action under Service v. Dulles
    Search
  18. to grant stays, provides scant support for the injunction issued here. The Court of Appeals also relied upon FTC v. Dean
    Search
  19. And we see nothing in the record to suggest that any judicial review available under the doctrine of Service v. Dulles
    Search
  20. But, at the other end of the spectrum, in Arrow Transportation Co. v. Southern
    Search
  21. with this consideration the historical denial of all equitable relief by the federal courts in cases such as White v. Berry
    Search
  22. See Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Assn. v. FPC
    Search
  23. here), we note that there was a determination that such a loss of employment could be 'irreparable harm' in Reeber v. Rossell
    Search
  24. injunction, and must conform to the standards applicable to preliminary injunctions. National Mediation Board v. Airline
    Search
  25. U. S. 500 , 359 U. S. 506 -507 (1959), and the Court of Appeals itself in Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Assn. v. FPC
    Search
  26. Murray v. Kunzig
    Search
  27. Parsons v. United
    Search
  28. The Court quoted from Morgan v. Nunn
    Search
  29. Scripps-Howard Radio v. FCC
    Search
  30. Circuit, in an opinion cited by the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in National Mediation Board v. Airline
    Search
  31. Pan American World Airways v. Flight
    Search
  32. is an issue, should be reserved for that situation, rather than employed in the routine case. See also Wettre v. Hague
    Search
  33. discretion on a showing of irreparable injury to the applicant or to the public interest, Scripps-Howard Radio v. FCC
    Search
  34. Department of Justice suggests, to issuance of stays by a court only after an appeal has been taken. We held in FTC v. Dean
    Search
  35. The District Court has at least a limited review of the Commission, Norton v. Macy
    Search
  36. Dozer v. United
    Search
  37. in many cases the ultimate absolution never catches up with the stigma of the accusation. Thus, the court in Schwartz v. Covington
    Search
  38. denigrate the importance of one's social standing or the status of social stigma as legally recognized harm. In Ah Kow v. Nuan
    Search
  39. is alleged to be the basis of the discharge, the requirements of procedural due process are obvious. We said in Wieman v. Updegraff
    Search
  40. Schwartz v. Covington
    Search
  41. of law have yet been filed in this case, no valid preliminary injunction was ever issued. See National Mediation Board v. Air
    Search
  42. Sims v. Greene
    Search
  43. Mayo v. Lakeland
    Search
  44. the District of Columbia Circuit in National Mediation Board, supra, on which the majority relies. See also Sims v. Greene
    Search
  45. than the long-recognized principles of equity applied in all other situations. See Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Assn. v. FPC
    Search
  46. of life -- e.g., to buy food, meet mortgage or rent payments, or procure medical services. Cf. Goldberg v. Kelly
    Search
  47. the wrongful nature of their dismissal is finally settled and their right to backpay established. See, e.g., Paroczay v. United
    Search
  48. Paterson v. United
    Search
  49. U.S. Supreme Court Sampson v. Murray
    Search
  50. Kunzi v. Murray
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial