Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Alexander Vs. Gardner-denver Co.

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Feb 19, 1974

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

62 entries 3 linked 59 unlinked
Show
  1. Wilko Vs. Swan US Supreme Court · Dec 07, 1953
  2. Mcdonnell Douglas Corp. Vs. Green US Supreme Court · May 14, 1973
  3. Republic Steel Corp. Vs. Maddox US Supreme Court · Jan 25, 1965
  4. Alexander v. Gardner-Denver
    Search
  5. Co. - 415 U.S. 36 (1974) U.S. Supreme Court Alexander v. Gardner-Denver
    Search
  6. Co., 415 U.S. 36 (1974) Alexander v. Gardner-Denver
    Search
  7. and devices that discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green
    Search
  8. Griggs v. Duke
    Search
  9. no reasonable cause to believe that the Act has been violated. McDonnell-Douglas Page 415 U. S. 45 Corp. v. Green
    Search
  10. injury, but also vindicates the important congressional policy against discriminatory employment practices. Hutchins v. United
    Search
  11. Bowe v. Colgate-Palmolive
    Search
  12. Jenkins v. United
    Search
  13. Gas Corp., 400 F.2d 28, 33 (CA5 1968). See also Newman v. Piggie
    Search
  14. and by the federal policy favoring arbitration of labor dispute, as enunciated by this Court in Textile Workers Union v. Lincoln
    Search
  15. See also Boys Markets v. Page
    Search
  16. Gateway Coal Co. v. United
    Search
  17. b), (e), and (f). See McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green
    Search
  18. Newman v. Piggie
    Search
  19. practice charge or as a petition for clarification of the union's representation certificate under the Act. Carey v. Westinghouse
    Search
  20. Cf. Smith v. Evening
    Search
  21. may waive certain statutory rights related to collective activity, such as the right to strike. Mastro Plastics Corp. v. NLRB
    Search
  22. Boys Markets v. Retail
    Search
  23. an employee's rights under Title VII are not susceptible of Page 415 U. S. 52 prospective waiver. See Wilko v. Swan
    Search
  24. that no additional concession may be exacted from any employee as the price for enforcing those rights. J. I. Case Co. v. NLRB
    Search
  25. United Steelworkers of America v. Enterprise
    Search
  26. a cause of action against employees. An employer cannot be the victim of discriminatory employment practices. Oubichon v. North
    Search
  27. is the union's reciprocal promise not to strike. As the Page 415 U. S. 55 Court stated in Boys Markets v. Retail
    Search
  28. those misunderstandings or discriminatory practices that might otherwise precipitate resort to the judicial forum. v. Respondent
    Search
  29. U.S. Bulk Carriers v. Arguelles
    Search
  30. of arbitrators pertains primarily to the law of the shop, not the law of the land. United Steelworkers of America v. Warrior
    Search
  31. and testimony under Page 415 U. S. 58 oath, are often severely limited or unavailable. See Bernhardt v. Polygraphic
    Search
  32. the solution lies in applying a more demanding deferral standard, such as that adopted by the Fifth Circuit in Rios v. Reynolds
    Search
  33. The District Court recognized that a conflict of authorities existed on this issue, but chose to rely on Dewey v. Reynolds
    Search
  34. are pursued simultaneously. See Spann v. Kaywood
    Search
  35. F.2d 120, 122 (1971). The Fifth, Seventh, and Ninth Circuits have squarely rejected a preclusion rule. See Hutchins v United
    Search
  36. Oubichon v. North
    Search
  37. United Steelworkers of America v. American
    Search
  38. United Steelworkers of America v. Warrior
    Search
  39. Wheel & Car Corp., 363 U. S. 593 (1960). In Textile Workers Union v. Lincoln
    Search
  40. Wheel & Car Corp., supra, at 363 U. S. 599 . And in Republic Steel Corp. v. Maddox
    Search
  41. The District Court adopted the reasoning of the Sixth Circuit in Dewey v. Reynolds
    Search
  42. Newman v. Avco
    Search
  43. have recognized that the doctrine of election of remedies does not apply to suits under Title VII. See, e.g., Bowe v. Colgate-Palmolive
    Search
  44. Hutchings v. United
    Search
  45. Macklin v. Spector
    Search
  46. Voutsis v. Union
    Search
  47. U.S. Supreme Court Alexander v. Gardner-Denver
    Search
  48. Corp. v. Green
    Search
  49. Hutchins v. United
    Search
  50. Textile Workers Union v. Lincoln
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial