Citation network
Morton Vs. Ruiz
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 20, 1974
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 199 (1974) U.S. Supreme Court Morton v. RuizSearch
-
U.S. 199 (1974) Morton v. RuizSearch
-
eligibility requirements in order to allocate the limited funds available to him for this purpose. See Dandridge v. WilliamsSearch
-
and obligations carries with it the responsibility not only to remain consistent with the governing legislation, FMC v. SeatrainSearch
-
Dixon v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 451 (1952), but also to employ procedures that conform to the law. See NLRB v. Wyman-GordonSearch
-
This is so even where the internal procedures are possibly more rigorous than otherwise would be required. Service v. DullesSearch
-
no reason why the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act could not or should not have been met. Cf. SEC v. ChenerySearch
-
fairly with Indians wherever located has been recognized by this Court on many occasions. See, e.g., Seminole Nation v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Seminole Nation v. UnitedSearch
-
Squire v. CapoemanSearch
-
of the Snyder Act by the agency best suited to do this, and that deference is due its interpretation. See Griggs v. DukeSearch
-
of an agency. Skidmore v. SwiftSearch
-
for an agency interpretation to be granted deference, it must be consistent with the congressional purpose. Espinoza v. FarahSearch
-
Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCCSearch
-
See Papago Tribe v. UnitedSearch
-
Graham v. RichardsonSearch
-
to social security and state welfare benefits equally with other citizens of the State. State ex rel. Williams v. KampSearch
-
urban, assimilated or nonassimilated), as to the increase over the lesser group then being serviced. See United States v. WiseSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Morton v. RuizSearch
-
See Dandridge v. WilliamsSearch
-
FMC v. SeatrainSearch
-
See NLRB v. Wyman-GordonSearch
-
Cf. SEC v. ChenerySearch
-
See Griggs v. DukeSearch
-
Skidmore v. SwiftSearch
-
Espinoza v. FarahSearch
-
Graham v. RichardsonSearch
-
Williams v. KampSearch
-
See United States v. WiseSearch
-
Jefferson v. HackneySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial