Citation network
Curtis Vs. Loether
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 20, 1974
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 189 (1974) U.S. Supreme Court Curtis v. LoetherSearch
-
U.S. 189 (1974) Curtis v. LoetherSearch
-
trial was neither authorized by Title VIII nor required by the Seventh Amendment, and denied the jury request. Rogers v. LoetherSearch
-
s request for attorney's fees and court costs. The Court of Appeals reversed on the jury trial issue. Rogers v. LoetherSearch
-
Parsons v. BedfordSearch
-
have often found the Seventh Amendment applicable to causes of action based on statutes. See, e.g., Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSearch
-
Hepner v. UnitedSearch
-
Fleitmann v. WelsbachSearch
-
U. S. 27 (1916) (antitrust laws), and the Page 415 U. S. 194 discussion of Fleitmann in Ross v. BernhardSearch
-
statute creates legal rights and remedies, enforceable in an action for damages in the ordinary courts of law. NLRB v. JonesSearch
-
and would substantially interfere with the NLRB's role in the statutory scheme. Katchen Page 415 U. S. 195 v. LandySearch
-
the statutory scheme of the Bankruptcy Act. Id. at 382 U. S. 339 . See also Guthrie National Bank v. GuthrieSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
within the meaning of our Seventh Amendment decisions. See, e.g., Ross v. BernhardSearch
-
relief. See, e.g., Mitchell v. DeMarioSearch
-
Porter v. WarnerSearch
-
and preliminary injunctive relief remains available without a jury trial even in damages actions. Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSearch
-
courts are evenly divided on the question. In addition to the District Court in this case, the court in Cauley v. SmithSearch
-
Kastner v. BrackettSearch
-
F.Supp. 1151 (Nev.1971), and Kelly v. ArmbrustSearch
-
United States v. Thirty-sevenSearch
-
Porter v. WarnerSearch
-
Texas & Pacific R. Co. v. RigsbySearch
-
has no application to causes of action created by statute See, e.g., International Brotherhood of Boilermakers v. BraswellSearch
-
Simmons v. AviscoSearch
-
Arnstein v. PorterSearch
-
See Rogers v. LoetherSearch
-
to the equitable relief sought. Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSearch
-
Swofford v. B&WSearch
-
Johnson v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Robinson v. LorillardSearch
-
McFerren v. CountySearch
-
Harkless v. SweenySearch
-
Smith v. HamptonSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Curtis v. LoetherSearch
-
Rogers v. LoetherSearch
-
Fleitmann v. WelsbachSearch
-
NLRB v. JonesSearch
-
Guthrie National Bank v. GuthrieSearch
-
Mitchell v. DeMarioSearch
-
Cauley v. SmithSearch
-
(Nev.1971), and Kelly v. ArmbrustSearch
-
International Brotherhood of Boilermakers v. BraswellSearch
-
Swofford v. B&WSearch
-
McFerren v. CountySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial