Citation network
United States Vs. Matlock
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 20, 1974
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 164 (1974) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. MatlockSearch
-
U.S. 164 (1974) United States v. MatlockSearch
-
post, p. 415 U. S. 188 . MR. JUSTICE WHITE delivered the opinion of the Court. In Schneckloth v. BustamonteSearch
-
This Court left open, in Amos v. UnitedSearch
-
or effects is valid as against the absent, nonconsenting person with whom that authority is shared. In Frazier v. CuppSearch
-
assumed the risk that his cousin would allow someone else to look inside. Ibid. More generally, in Schneckloth v. BustamonteSearch
-
searches in cases like Frazier and Coolidge v. NewSearch
-
In Brinegar v. UnitedSearch
-
on ex parte affidavits containing out-of-court statements of identified and unidentified persons. United States v. VentrescaSearch
-
U. S. 102 , 380 U. S. 108 (1965). An arrest and search without a warrant were involved in McCray v. IllinoisSearch
-
hearsay at respondent's trial either because statements against penal interest are to be excluded under Donnelly v. UnitedSearch
-
that her consent, however voluntary, would not bind the respondent with regard to the search of his room. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
E.g., United States v. StoneSearch
-
United States v. WixomSearch
-
United States v. AirdoSearch
-
F.2d 103, 106-107, cert. denied, 389 U.S. 913 (1967). Each of these cases cited with approval United States v. SferasSearch
-
F.2d 69, 74 (CA7), cert. denied sub nom. Skally v. UnitedSearch
-
E.g., United States v. EllisSearch
-
United States v. CataldoSearch
-
Cabey v. MazurkiewiczSearch
-
United States v. ThompsonSearch
-
Gurleski v. UnitedSearch
-
Wright v. UnitedSearch
-
Roberts v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. WilsonSearch
-
Nelson v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Burge v. UnitedSearch
-
E.g., People v. HowardSearch
-
People v. GorgSearch
-
People v. HaskellSearch
-
People v. WalkerSearch
-
Cabey v. RundleSearch
-
State v. CairoSearch
-
Burge v. StateSearch
-
party consent does not rest upon the law of property, with its attendant historical and legal refinements, see Chapman v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 610 (1961) (landlord could not validly consent to the search of a house he had rented to another), Stoner v. CaliforniaSearch
-
proof at suppression hearings should impose no greater burden than proof by a preponderance of the evidence. See Lego v. TwomeySearch
-
when he had the opportunity to do so, even if substantial probable cause existed to justify a search. In Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
Id. at 333 U. S. 13 -14. In Trupiano v. UnitedSearch
-
Id. at 334 U. S. 705 . Page 415 U. S. 186 Likewise, in McDonald v. UnitedSearch
-
Id. at 335 U. S. 455 -456. Jones v. UnitedSearch
-
a search conducted without a warrant can give more authority than a search conducted with a warrant. See United States v. LefkowitzSearch
-
which they may have expected to find and which doubtless would have been specified in a valid warrant, see Coolidge v. NewSearch
-
license to search all places and for everything in a given place, limited only by their own discretion. See Warden v. HaydenSearch
-
For an example of the abuse to which a warrantless search is subject, see Kremen v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. MatlockSearch
-
of the Court. In Schneckloth v. BustamonteSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial