Citation network
Defunis Vs. Odegaard
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 23, 1974
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Distinguished
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U.S. 312 (1974) U.S. Supreme Court DeFunis v. OdegaardSearch
-
U.S. 312 (1974) DeFunis v. OdegaardSearch
-
Liner v. JafcoSearch
-
Powell v. McCormackSearch
-
Sibron v. NewSearch
-
in contexts no less significant, fully to accept representations such as these as parameters for decision. See Gerende v. ElectionSearch
-
Ehlert v. UnitedSearch
-
Law Students Research Council v. WadmondSearch
-
United States v. Trans-MissouriSearch
-
Walling v. HelmerichSearch
-
United States v. PhosphateSearch
-
United States v. MunsingwearSearch
-
Maryland Casualty Co. v. PacificSearch
-
s qualification normally introduces a capricious and irrelevant factor working an invidious discrimination, Anderson v. MartinSearch
-
Harper v. VirginiaSearch
-
First, we have held that pro rata representation of the races is not required either on juries, see Cassell v. TexasSearch
-
U. S. 282 , 339 U. S. 286 -287, or in public schools, Swann v. Charlotte-MecklenburgSearch
-
Board of Education, 402 U. S. 1 , 402 U. S. 24 . Moreover, in Hughes v. SuperiorSearch
-
the matter, leaving it entirely in the discretion of the school, for then we would have effectively overruled Sweatt v. PainterSearch
-
which can claim that it has always treated Japanese and Chinese in a fair and evenhanded manner. See, e.g., Yick Wo v. HopkinsSearch
-
U. S. 633 . This Court has not sustained a racial classification since the wartime cases of Korematsu v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 323 U. S. 214 , and Hirabayashi v. UnitedSearch
-
That is the point at the heart of all our Page 416 U. S. 343 school desegregation cases, from Brown v. BoardSearch
-
of Education, 347 U. S. 483 , through Swann v. Charlotte-MecklenburgSearch
-
acquire an accordion-like quality. Speech is closely brigaded with action when it triggers a fight, Chaplinsky v. NewSearch
-
eliminate arbitrary and irrelevant barriers to entry by certain racial groups into the legal profession groups. Griggs v. DukeSearch
-
Power Co., 401 U. S. 424 . In Swann v. Charlotte-MecklenburgSearch
-
set forth in Plessy v. FergusonSearch
-
In Johnson v. CommitteeSearch
-
or certiorari on February 19, 1974. Johnson v. WilmerSearch
-
practice of law to a man who could not conscientiously bear arms. The vote against him was five to four. Konigsberg v. StateSearch
-
Bar, 353 U. S. 252 , followed, after remand, by Konigsberg v. StateSearch
-
answer questions concerning Communist Party membership. He, too, was excluded five to four. The petitioner in Schware v. BoardSearch
-
Party, but because he asserted that the First and Fourteenth Amendments protected him from that inquiry. Baird v. StateSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial