Citation network
Pernell Vs. Southall Realty
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 24, 1974
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Pernell v. SouthallSearch
-
Realty - 416 U.S. 363 (1974) U.S. Supreme Court Pernell v. SouthallSearch
-
Realty, 416 U.S. 363 (1974) Pernell v. SouthallSearch
-
Kass v. BaskinSearch
-
United States v. Thirty-sevenSearch
-
absent a constitutional claim or a problem of general federal law of nationwide application. See, e.g., Griffin v. UnitedSearch
-
Fisher v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 328 U. S. 463 , 328 U. S. 476 (1946). See also Miller v. UnitedSearch
-
sense that we are barred from reconsidering a state court's interpretation of a state statute. See, e.g., O'Brien v. SkinnerSearch
-
Memorial Hospital v. MaricopaSearch
-
Griffin v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Rights, it is fully applicable to courts established by Congress in the District of Columbia. See Capital Traction Co. v. HofSearch
-
to recover land, like actions for damages to a person or property, are actions at law triable to a jury. In Whitehead v. ShattuckSearch
-
Scott v. NeelySearch
-
between title to and possession of property, of course, was well recognized at common law. See Grant Timber & Mfg. Co. v. GraySearch
-
Parsons v. BedfordSearch
-
of the sort traditionally enforced in an action at law, rather than in an action in equity or admiralty. See Curtis v. LoetherSearch
-
came to be established in the Seventh Amendment. Respondent relies primarily on our decision in Capital Traction Co. v. HofSearch
-
Page 416 U. S. 382 IV The Court of Appeals also relied on our opinion in Block v. HirshSearch
-
A.2d at 496. We think the Court of Appeals misunderstood the rationale of this case. Block v. HirshSearch
-
proceedings, where jury trials would be incompatible with the whole concept of administrative adjudication. See Curtis v. LoetherSearch
-
U.S. at 415 U. S. 194 . See also NLRB v. JonesSearch
-
involves rights and remedies recognized at common law, it must preserve to parties their right to a jury trial. Curtis v. LoetherSearch
-
and the right to jury trial. We note, for example, that the Oregon landlord-tenant procedure at issue in Lindsey v. NormetSearch
-
been complied with and that the premises are not being maintained in a habitable condition by the landlord. See Javins v. FirstSearch
-
Superior Court and Court of Appeals must be treated as state courts for all purposes. Cf. District of Columbia v. CarterSearch
-
through 16-909. Other unresolved questions involve the extent to which the principles of Younger v. HarrisSearch
-
and related cases apply to the relationship between the District's two court systems. See generally Sullivan v. MurphySearch
-
See T. Plucknett, A Concise History of the Common Law 341 (4th ed.1948). See also Grant Timber & Mfg. Co. v. GraySearch
-
Little v. HeatonSearch
-
West v. DavisSearch
-
Flower v. DarbySearch
-
Spencer v. GodwinSearch
-
Ash v. CalvertSearch
-
See Whitehead v. ShattuckSearch
-
U. S. 146 (1891). See also Doe d. Cheny v. BattenSearch
-
Charter v. CordwentSearch
-
Shapiro v. ChristopherSearch
-
Service Parking Corp. v. Trans-LuxSearch
-
Shipley v. MajorSearch
-
The 1864 Act was essentially the same as an 1836 Massachusetts statute. See Willis v. EasternSearch
-
detainer were derived from the English forcible entry and detainer statutes, including that of Henry VI. See Page v. DwightSearch
-
Boyle v. BoyleSearch
-
Suits were brought, for example, in the name of the State. See, e.g., The King v. WilsonSearch
-
The King v. HarrisSearch
-
The King v. DormySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial