Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Kahn Vs. Shevin

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 24, 1974

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

35 entries 8 linked 27 unlinked
Show
  1. Reed Vs. Reed US Supreme Court · Nov 22, 1971
  2. Ferguson Vs. Skrupa US Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1963
  3. Ohio Oil Co. Vs. Conway US Supreme Court · Mar 05, 1929
  4. Carrington Vs. Rash US Supreme Court · Mar 01, 1965
  5. Frontiero Vs. Richardson US Supreme Court · May 14, 1973
  6. MclaughlIn Vs. Florida US Supreme Court · Dec 07, 1964
  7. Bolling Vs. Sharpe US Supreme Court · May 17, 1954
  8. Muller Vs. Oregon US Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1908
  9. U.S. 351 (1974) U.S. Supreme Court Kahn v. Shevin
    Search
  10. U.S. 351 (1974) Kahn v. Shevin
    Search
  11. financial impact of spousal loss upon the sex for whom that loss imposes a disproportionately heavy burden. Frontiero v. Richardson
    Search
  12. U. S. 71 , 404 U. S. 76 , quoting Royster Guano Co. v. Virginia
    Search
  13. U. S. 412 , 253 U. S. 415 . This is not a case like Frontiero v. Richardson
    Search
  14. Lehnhausen v. Lake
    Search
  15. not in conflict with the Federal Constitution. Allied Stores v. Bowers
    Search
  16. Quoting Reed v. Reed
    Search
  17. See Bell's Gap R. Co. v. Pennsylvania
    Search
  18. Madden v. Kentucky
    Search
  19. Lawrence v. State
    Search
  20. Royster Guano Co. v. Virginia
    Search
  21. The famous Brandeis Brief in Muller v. Oregon
    Search
  22. have been inexcusably utilized to stereotype and stigmatize politically powerless segments of society. See Frontiero v. Richardson
    Search
  23. because they promote legitimate governmental interests, such as efficacious administration of government. Frontiero v. Richardson
    Search
  24. administrative convenience' is not a shibboleth, the mere recitation of which dictates constitutionality. See Shapiro v. Thompson
    Search
  25. See Loving v. Virginia
    Search
  26. See Graham v. Richardson
    Search
  27. See Oyama v. California
    Search
  28. Korematsu v. United
    Search
  29. Hirabayashi v. United
    Search
  30. See Frontiero v. Richardson
    Search
  31. Sail'er Inn, Inc. v. Kirby
    Search
  32. but administrative efficiency is not an adequate justification for discriminations based purely on sex. Frontiero v. Richardson
    Search
  33. U.S. Supreme Court Kahn v. Shevin
    Search
  34. the Federal Constitution. Allied Stores v. Bowers
    Search
  35. See Shapiro v. Thompson
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales