Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

United States Vs. Chavez

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 13, 1974

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

39 entries 3 linked 36 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Cox US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1837
  2. United States Vs. Giordano US Supreme Court · May 13, 1974
  3. United States Vs. Roberts US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1850
  4. U.S. 562 (1974) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Chavez
    Search
  5. U.S. 562 (1974) United States v. Chavez
    Search
  6. such power, evidence secured under that order Page 416 U. S. 563 was properly suppressed. United States v. Giordono
    Search
  7. is to be lawful under Title III, and hence does not require suppression of the wiretap evidence. United States v. Giordano
    Search
  8. Page 416 U. S. 564 MR. JUSTICE WHITE delivered the opinion of the Court. This case, like United States v. Giordano
    Search
  9. secured under that order was properly suppressed for the reasons stated in the opinion filed today in United States v. Giordano
    Search
  10. In United States v. Giordano
    Search
  11. Support for the latter claim is drawn from the District Court decision in United States v. Focarile
    Search
  12. F.Supp. 1033, 1057-1060 (Md.), aff'd on other grounds sub nom. United States v. Giordano
    Search
  13. United States v. Giordano
    Search
  14. The relevant statutory provisions are set forth in the Appendix to United States v. Giordano
    Search
  15. of wiretap evidence has been denied on the ground of substantial compliance with Title III requirements. United States v. James
    Search
  16. United States v. Pisacano
    Search
  17. United States v. Becker
    Search
  18. United States v. Ceraso
    Search
  19. United States v. Bobo
    Search
  20. United States v. Roberts
    Search
  21. a specially designated Assistant, unless the latter happens to be the case. Brief for United States in United States v. Giordano
    Search
  22. the affiant, a deficiency which has been held by some courts to require suppression under Fed.Rule Crim.Proc. 41, King v. United
    Search
  23. States, 282 F.2d 398 (CA4 1960), or under the Fourth Amendment, United States ex rel. Pugh v. Pate
    Search
  24. STEWART, and MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL join, concurring in part and dissenting in part in No. 72-1319, United States v. Chavez
    Search
  25. and concurring in No. 72-1057, United States v. Giordano
    Search
  26. Safe Streets Act of 1968, which imposes express limitations on the use of electronic surveillance. In United States v. Giordano
    Search
  27. is also involved in the Fernandez wiretap in United States v. Chavez
    Search
  28. the Court recognized in Gelbard v. United
    Search
  29. Northern Securities Co. v. United
    Search
  30. Proposed Legislation on Wiretapping and Eavesdropping after Berger v. New
    Search
  31. York and Katz v. United
    Search
  32. U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Chavez
    Search
  33. United States v. Giordono
    Search
  34. United States v. Focarile
    Search
  35. United States v. James
    Search
  36. King v. United
    Search
  37. Pugh v. Pate
    Search
  38. Gelbard v. United
    Search
  39. Berger v. New
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial