Citation network
Allee Vs. Medrano
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 20, 1974
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 802 (1974) U.S. Supreme Court Allee v. MedranoSearch
-
U.S. 802 (1974) Allee v. MedranoSearch
-
did not interfere with pending state prosecutions, so that special considerations relevant to cases like Younger v. HarrisSearch
-
a persistent pattern of police misconduct, as opposed to isolated incidents, injunctive relief is appropriate. Hague v. CIOSearch
-
prosecutions under the two remaining statutes, and for further findings and reconsideration in light of Steffel v. ThompsonSearch
-
Walling v. HelmerichSearch
-
NLRB v. RaytheonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
SEC v. MedicalSearch
-
with prosecutions pending in the state courts, so that the special considerations relevant to cases like Younger v. HarrisSearch
-
state remedies before bringing their federal claims under the Civil Rights Act of 1871 to federal court. McNeese v. BoardSearch
-
from appellants' concerted conduct. No remedy at law would be adequate to provide such protection. Dombrowski v. PfisterSearch
-
U. S. 611 , 390 U. S. 620 , citing Cox v. LouisianaSearch
-
Wright v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Edwards v. SouthSearch
-
Where, as here, there is a persistent pattern of police misconduct, injunctive relief is appropriate. In Hague v. CommitteeSearch
-
pressed with arguments by the appellants that these parts of the decree are inconsistent with the teachings of Younger v. HarrisSearch
-
U. S. 37 , and Samuels v. MackellSearch
-
a federal Page 416 U. S. 817 court is asked to intervene in pending state criminal prosecutions. Steffel v. ThompsonSearch
-
live, continuing controversy, such relief would ordinarily be appropriate if justified by the merits of the case. Gray v. SandersSearch
-
is to remand the case to the District Court for further findings. Page 416 U. S. 819 Cf. Diffenderfer v. CentralSearch
-
declaratory relief as to the statutes, then the case would not be governed by Younger at all, but by Steffel v. ThompsonSearch
-
of the District Court as to these statutes and remand for further findings and reconsideration in light of Steffel v. ThompsonSearch
-
La Casita Farms, Inc. v. UnitedSearch
-
It is argued that Public Service Comm'n v. BrashearSearch
-
United States v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Indeed, the three-judge court is required to hear the nonconstitutional attack upon the statute, Florida Lime Growers v. JacobsenSearch
-
U. S. 397 , 397 U. S. 402 . The instant case is nearly identical to Milky Way v. LearySearch
-
U.S. at 312 U. S. 625 n. 5. This view was followed in Perez v. LedesmaSearch
-
In NAACP v. ThompsonSearch
-
Id. at 838. The findings here show at least that much. In Lankford v. GelstonSearch
-
Id. at 202. See also Wolin v. PortSearch
-
an appellate court determines mootness as of the time it considers the case, not as of the time it was filed. Roe v. WadeSearch
-
as persons deprived of their rights secured by the Constitution and laws, American Fed. of State, Co. & Mun. Emp. v. WoodwardSearch
-
that protected First Amendment rights flow to unions as well as to their members and organizers. Carpenters Union v. Ritter'sSearch
-
NAACP v. ButtonSearch
-
See Dombrowski v. PfisterSearch
-
Cameron v. JohnsonSearch
-
U. S. 611 , 390 U. S. 619 -620, and Perez v. LedesmaSearch
-
and for reconsideration, in the case of the relief granted with respect to two of the statutes, in light of Steffel v. ThompsonSearch
-
remand, but of other courts that must wrestle with the myriad problems presented in applying the doctrine of Younger v. HarrisSearch
-
II In this part, I consider the problems of mootness and standing. In 416 U. S. I discuss Younger v. HarrisSearch
-
on the Page 416 U. S. 827 facts as it found them that appellees had overcome the burden imposed by Younger v. HarrisSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial