Citation network
Parker Vs. Levy
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 19, 1974
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 733 (1974) U.S. Supreme Court Parker v. LevySearch
-
U.S. 733 (1974) Parker v. LevySearch
-
It relied on such cases as Grayned v. CitySearch
-
Papachristou v. CitySearch
-
Coates v. CitySearch
-
of Cincinnati, 402 U. S. 611 (1971), and Gelling v. TexasSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Nonetheless, relying chiefly on Gooding v. WilsonSearch
-
Wheat. 19, 25 U. S. 35 (1827). As the opinion in Martin v. MottSearch
-
of the services impart accepted meaning to the seemingly imprecise standards of Arts. 133 and 134. In Dynes v. HooverSearch
-
Id. at 61 U. S. 82 . In Smith v. WhitneySearch
-
interpretation of military law by military tribunals. Id. at 116 U. S. 178 -179. In United States v. FletcherSearch
-
and with which those trained only in civilian law are unfamiliar. In Swaim v. UnitedSearch
-
and in respect to which their conclusions cannot be controlled or reviewed by the civil courts. As was said in Smith v. WhitneySearch
-
United States v. FrantzSearch
-
United States v. SadinskySearch
-
United States v. HolidaySearch
-
It applies only to calls for active opposition to the military policy of the United States, United States v. PriestSearch
-
United States v. HarveySearch
-
United States v. HoweSearch
-
military sources, further content may be supplied even in these areas by less formalized custom and usage. Dynes v. HooverSearch
-
Lanzetta v. NewSearch
-
Winters v. NewSearch
-
that the particular conduct which he engaged in was punishable. This is a case, then, of the type adverted to in Smith v. GoguenSearch
-
of overbreadth, but we do not believe it is supported by prior decisions of this Court. We have noted in Smith v. GoguenSearch
-
affairs. Clearly, that standard is Page 417 U. S. 757 met here, for as the Court stated in United States v. NationalSearch
-
George, 341 U. S. 223 , 341 U. S. 231 (1951), and United States v. PetrilloSearch
-
we have consistently sought an interpretation which supports the constitutionality of legislation. E.g., United States v. RumelySearch
-
Screws v. UnitedSearch
-
should not attach where one could not reasonably understand that his contemplated conduct is proscribed. United States v. HarrissSearch
-
a statute must of necessity be examined in the light of the conduct with which a defendant is charged. Robinson v. UnitedSearch
-
Page 417 U. S. 758 In Gooding v. WilsonSearch
-
construction suggests itself as a vehicle for rehabilitating the statutes in a single prosecution,' Dombrowski v. PfisterSearch
-
expounded the reason for this different application of First Amendment doctrines in its opinion in United States v. PriestSearch
-
unless it both is directed to inciting imminent lawless action and is likely to produce such action. Brandenburg v. OhioSearch
-
undermine the effectiveness of response to command. If it does, it is constitutionally unprotected. United States v. GraySearch
-
In Broadrick v. OklahomaSearch
-
CSC v. LetterSearch
-
F.2d at 797. See Whelchel v. McDonaldSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Parker v. LevySearch
-
Grayned v. CitySearch
-
and Gelling v. TexasSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial