Citation network
Warden Vs. Marrero
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 19, 1974
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 653 (1974) U.S. Supreme Court Warden v. MarreroSearch
-
U.S. 653 (1974) Warden v. MarreroSearch
-
a), Bradley v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. 1128 (1974). We agree with the District Court and reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals. Bradley v. UnitedSearch
-
Bradley v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Bell v. MarylandSearch
-
with different penalties, whether the reenacted legislation increased or decreased the penalties. See Bradley v. UnitedSearch
-
Lindzey v. StateSearch
-
Hartung v. PeopleSearch
-
Page 417 U. S. 661 United States v. ReisingerSearch
-
Thus, the Court agreed with the construction of the clause by Mr. Justice Miller, as Circuit Justice, in United States v. UlriciSearch
-
criminal sentencing laws repealing harsher ones in force at the time of the commission of an offense. See, e.g., Jones v. UnitedSearch
-
Lovely v. UnitedSearch
-
Although the general saving clause does not ordinarily preserve discarded remedies or procedures, see Hertz v. WoodmanSearch
-
United States v. ObermeierSearch
-
be expected to think that he was not suffering a penalty when he was denied eligibility for parole. See United States v. RossSearch
-
Durant v. UnitedSearch
-
Rooney v. NorthSearch
-
Dakota, 196 U. S. 319 , 196 U. S. 325 (1905) (emphasis added). See Love v. FitzharrisSearch
-
Lindsey v. WashingtonSearch
-
Umbenhowar v. McDonnellSearch
-
for Congress, subject to judicial veto only when the legislative judgment oversteps constitutional bounds. See Gore v. UnitedSearch
-
Bell v. UnitedSearch
-
Simone, 468 F.2d 1196 (CA2 1972) ( but see United States v. HuguetSearch
-
Perea v. UnitedSearch
-
Seventh, and District of Columbia Circuits have held that narcotics offenders are eligible for parole. See Alvarado v. McLaughlinSearch
-
Amaya v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. McGarrSearch
-
United States v. MarshallSearch
-
The statement in Morrissey v. BrewerSearch
-
See Great Northern R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Hamm v. RockSearch
-
United States v. StephensSearch
-
In Morrissey v. BrewerSearch
-
technical abatement of a prosecution for an offense that was committed before the criminal statute was repealed. Hamm v. RockSearch
-
however, is not in line with the traditional common law rule favoring application of existing law. United States v. ChambersSearch
-
Wall. 88 (1871). See United States v. SchoonerSearch
-
to include the terms of the sentence have dealt only with the length of the sentence actually imposed. United States v. KirbySearch
-
Duffel v. UnitedSearch
-
Maceo v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial