Citation network
Saxbe Vs. Washington Post Co.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 24, 1974
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
Saxbe v. WashingtonSearch
-
Post Co. - 417 U.S. 843 (1974) U.S. Supreme Court Saxbe v. WashingtonSearch
-
Post Co., 417 U.S. 843 (1974) Saxbe v. WashingtonSearch
-
and maximum security prisons does not abridge the freedom of the press that the First Amendment guarantees, Pell v. ProcunierSearch
-
of Columbia Circuit. We stayed the District Court's order pending the completion of that appeal, sub nom. Kleindienst v. WashingtonSearch
-
findings of fact and particularly for reconsideration in light of this Court's intervening decision in Branzburg v. HayesSearch
-
regarding visituations to prison inmates do not differ significantly from the California policies considered in Pell v. ProcunierSearch
-
of the California Department of Corrections Manual, which we considered in Pell v. ProcunierSearch
-
and Procunier v. HillerySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U.S.App.D.C. at 80, 494 F.2d at 999. See Adderley v. FloridaSearch
-
members of the public. Page 417 U. S. 850 We find this case constitutionally indistinguishable from Pell v. ProcunierSearch
-
See Seattle-Tacoma Newspaper Guild v. ParkerSearch
-
F.2d 1062, 1066-1067 (1973). See also Hillery v. ProcunierSearch
-
to continue its established policy. In its order remanding the case for reconsideration in light of Branzburg v. HayesSearch
-
falls outside the purview of First Amendment concern. The Court principally relies on two precedents. In Zemel v. RuskSearch
-
right to visit Cuba in order to inform himself of the conditions there. The more recent authority is Branzburg v. HayesSearch
-
United States v. O'BrienSearch
-
stated, the distinction that formed the basis for decision in Zemel is not helpful here. Nor does Branzburg v. HayesSearch
-
concerns encompass the receipt of information and ideas, as well as the right of free expression. Kleindienst v. MandelSearch
-
Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCCSearch
-
Lamont v. PostmasterSearch
-
Martin v. CitySearch
-
freedoms, I must consider whether the Government has met its heavy burden of justification for that policy. In Tinker v. DesSearch
-
guarantees in light of the special characteristics of the prison environment. That opportunity arose in Procunier v. MartinezSearch
-
and United States v. O'BrienSearch
-
U.S. at 416 U. S. 413 . We announced Procunier v. MartinezSearch
-
a new policy in accordance with its own needs and with the guidelines set forth in this opinion. Page 417 U. S. 875 V TheSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Saxbe v. WashingtonSearch
-
Kleindienst v. WashingtonSearch
-
See Adderley v. FloridaSearch
-
Hillery v. ProcunierSearch
-
of Branzburg v. HayesSearch
-
In Zemel v. RuskSearch
-
In Tinker v. DesSearch
-
United States v. O'BrienSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial