Citation network
Schlesinger Vs. Reservists Committee
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 25, 1974
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Distinguished
-
Schlesinger v. ReservistsSearch
-
Committee - 418 U.S. 208 (1974) U.S. Supreme Court Schlesinger v. ReservistsSearch
-
Committee, 418 U.S. 208 (1974) Schlesinger v. ReservistsSearch
-
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE BURGER delivered the opinion of the Court. We granted certiorari, sub nom. Richardson v. ReservistsSearch
-
Stop the War v. LairdSearch
-
was asserted Page 418 U. S. 213 to rest exclusively with Congress, not the courts, under Powell v. McCormackSearch
-
resolution of which by the text of the Constitution was committed to the Congress under Baker v. CarrSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U. S. 83 (1968), and Baker v. CarrSearch
-
the meaning of the Incompatibility Clause. Pet. for Cert. 2. Page 418 U. S. 215 II A In Flast v. CohenSearch
-
upon which petitioners in part rely. Each of these doctrines poses a distinct and separate limitation, Powell v. McCormackSearch
-
same interest and suffer the same injury shared by all members of the class he represents. Indiana Employment Division v. BurneySearch
-
about the conduct of Government as a basis for taxpayer standing. Flast v. CohenSearch
-
now whether a citizen has standing to sue under such a generalized complaint. Our analysis begins with Baker v. CarrSearch
-
Id. at 369 U. S. 204 . Although dealing with a case of claimed taxpayer standing, Flast v. CohenSearch
-
Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSearch
-
Page 418 U. S. 219 Sierra Club v. MortonSearch
-
Laird v. TatumSearch
-
McCabe v. AtchisonSearch
-
action will cause that person private competitive injury, Association of Data Processing Service Organization, Inc. v. CampSearch
-
or a complaint that individual enjoyment of certain natural resources has been impaired by such action, United States v. SCRAPSearch
-
Doremus v. BoardSearch
-
if respondents have no standing to sue, no one would have standing is not a reason to find standing. See United States v. RichardsonSearch
-
respondents have standing to sue as taxpayers raises a different question from whether they may sue as citizens. Flast v. CohenSearch
-
That court thus held in effect that, if no justiciable question is presented, no one has standing. DaCosta v. LairdSearch
-
F.2d 1146, 1152 (1973). See also Sierra Club v. MortonSearch
-
standing in this Court because of the ambiguous reference in the Court of Appeals' judgment of affirmance to Flast v. CohenSearch
-
in support of its holding, nearly all of which contained language similar to that quoted in the text. See Frothingham v. MellonSearch
-
Tyler v. JudgesSearch
-
Giles v. HarrisSearch
-
Cf. Newman v. FrizzellSearch
-
cited with approval two of the principal cases relied upon in Ex parte Levitt, 302 U.S. 633 (1937). Frothingham v. MellonSearch
-
supra, was used for support in O'Shea v. LittletonSearch
-
U. S. 488 , 414 U. S. 494 (1974), as was Fairchild v. HughesSearch
-
supra, used in Baker v. CarrSearch
-
U.S. at 405 U. S. 739 . Earlier cases of the Court evidenced comparable concern. See, e.g., Newman v. FrizzellSearch
-
Lamm v. VolpeSearch
-
Pietsch v. PresidentSearch
-
Troutman v. ShriverSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Schlesinger v. ReservistsSearch
-
Richardson v. ReservistsSearch
-
Stop the War v. LairdSearch
-
and Baker v. CarrSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial