Citation network
United States Vs. Richardson
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 25, 1974
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Distinguished
-
U.S. 166 (1974) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. RichardsonSearch
-
U.S. 166 (1974) United States v. RichardsonSearch
-
The District Court's dismissal of the complaint for, inter alia, respondent's lack of standing under Flast v. CohenSearch
-
The District Court granted a motion for dismissal on the ground respondent lacked standing under Flast v. CohenSearch
-
The majority relied chiefly on Flast v. CohenSearch
-
maintain a suit for the relief sought, and we reverse. Page 418 U. S. 171 I As far back as Marbury v. MadisonSearch
-
any of the limitations of the political question doctrine, not then moot or calling for an advisory opinion. In Baker v. CarrSearch
-
except as it is called upon to adjudge the legal rights of litigants in actual controversies.' Liverpool Steamship Co. v. CommissionersSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Recently, in Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSearch
-
Although the recent holding of the Court in Flast v. CohenSearch
-
to prosecute this suit as a taxpayer, that case must be read with reference to its principal predecessor, Frothingham v. MellonSearch
-
Id. at 392 U. S. 99 , citing Baker v. CarrSearch
-
injury, in fact, even if it is not directly economic in nature. Association of Data Processing Organizations, Inc. v. CampSearch
-
any particular concrete injury as a result of the operation of this statute. As the Court noted in Sierra Club v. MortonSearch
-
Respondent here, like the petitioner in Levitt, also fails to clear the threshold hurdle of Baker v. CarrSearch
-
Page 418 U. S. 180 Baker v. CarrSearch
-
were nonjusticiable, and, in consequence, no one would have standing. See Gilligan v. MorganSearch
-
Environmental Protection Agency v. MinkSearch
-
The Court of Appeals thus appeared to rely on Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSearch
-
insofar as it relies on traditional barriers against federal taxpayer or citizen standing. And I agree that Flast v. CohenSearch
-
with the Court's statement of the bare-minimum constitutional requirements for standing. Drawing upon Baker v. CarrSearch
-
by noting the difficulties I see with the other two. And, while I do not disagree at this late date with the Baker v. CarrSearch
-
of the liberties and welfare of the people in quite as great a degree as the courts.' Missouri, Kansas & Texas R. Co. v. MaySearch
-
The power recognized in Marbury v. MadisonSearch
-
Frothingham v. MellonSearch
-
Tyler v. JudgesSearch
-
the federal courts to representatives of the public interest through specific statutory grants of standing. E.g., FCC v. SandersSearch
-
Trafficante v. MetropolitanSearch
-
have been reexamined and found sufficient. Compare, e.g., Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSearch
-
U. S. 150 (1970), and Page 418 U. S. 194 Barlow v. CollinsSearch
-
U. S. 159 (1970), with, e.g., Tennessee Electric Power Co. v. TVASearch
-
U. S. 118 (1939), and Alabama Power Co. v. IckesSearch
-
U. S. 464 (1938). See also Investment Co. Institute v. CampSearch
-
U. S. 45 (1970). Noneconomic interests have been recognized. E.g., Baker v. CarrSearch
-
U. S. 727 (1972). A stringently limited exception for federal taxpayer standing has been created. Flast v. CohenSearch
-
supra. The concept of particularized injury has been dramatically diluted. E.g., United States v. SCRAPSearch
-
S. 669 (1973). The revolution in standing doctrine that has occurred, particularly in the 12 years since Baker v. CarrSearch
-
U.S. at 405 U. S. 738 . Accord, Linda R. S. v. RichardSearch
-
has, on occasion, required a reading of the concept that threatens to transform it beyond recognition. E.g., Baker v. CarrSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. RichardsonSearch
-
In Baker v. CarrSearch
-
Liverpool Steamship Co. v. CommissionersSearch
-
Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial