Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Dorszynski Vs. United States

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 26, 1974

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

51 entries 4 linked 47 unlinked
Show
  1. Townsend Vs. Burke US Supreme Court · Jun 14, 1948
  2. irvine Vs. California US Supreme Court · Feb 08, 1954
  3. United States Vs. Waters US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1890
    Relied / Followed
  4. United States Vs. Tucker US Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1972
    Relied / Followed
  5. Dorszynski v. United
    Search
  6. States - 418 U.S. 424 (1974) U.S. Supreme Court Dorszynski v. United
    Search
  7. States, 418 U.S. 424 (1974) Dorszynski v. United
    Search
  8. Gore v. United
    Search
  9. Blockburger v. United
    Search
  10. Act has been accurately described as the most comprehensive federal statute concerned with sentencing. United States v. Coefield
    Search
  11. Gurera v. United
    Search
  12. States, 40 F.2d 338, 340-341 (CA8 1930). See Gore v. United
    Search
  13. of sentencing discretion, limited review is available when sentencing discretion is not exercised at all. Yates v. United
    Search
  14. United States v. Daniels
    Search
  15. United States v. Williams
    Search
  16. United States v. Hartford
    Search
  17. Williams v. United
    Search
  18. Cox v. United
    Search
  19. United States v. Jarratt
    Search
  20. United States v. Walker
    Search
  21. Brooks v. United
    Search
  22. United States v. Kaylor
    Search
  23. United States v. Coefield
    Search
  24. United States v. Schenker
    Search
  25. Small v. United
    Search
  26. a). See United States v. Kurzyna
    Search
  27. There is no contention here that the District Court relied upon improper or inaccurate information. United States v. Tucker
    Search
  28. the District Court, the Court of Appeals, or in the questions presented in the petition for certiorari. Phillips Co. v. Dumas
    Search
  29. Radio Officers' Union v. NLRB
    Search
  30. Id. at 15. Mr. James v. Bennett
    Search
  31. under the Act. Cox v. United
    Search
  32. court below, has agreed that the manner in which the sentencing judge exercises his discretion is thus limited. Brooks v. United
    Search
  33. United States v. Schenker
    Search
  34. United States v. MacDonald
    Search
  35. Small v. United
    Search
  36. be beneficial to the offender, and specifically ordered the trial judge to state the reasons for his conclusion. Cox v. United
    Search
  37. United States v. Velazquez
    Search
  38. United States v. Brown
    Search
  39. United States v. Tucker
    Search
  40. Shepard v. United
    Search
  41. U.S. Supreme Court Dorszynski v. United
    Search
  42. See Gore v. United
    Search
  43. Yates v. United
    Search
  44. United States v. Walker
    Search
  45. Small v. United
    Search
  46. See United States v. Kurzyna
    Search
  47. Phillips Co. v. Dumas
    Search
  48. Mr. James v. Bennett
    Search
  49. the Act. Cox v. United
    Search
  50. United States v. Brown
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales