Citation network
Cantrell Vs. Forest City Publishing Co.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 18, 1974
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Cantrell v. ForestSearch
-
City Publishing Co. - 419 U.S. 245 (1974) U.S. Supreme Court Cantrell v. ForestSearch
-
City Publishing Co., 419 U.S. 245 (1974) Cantrell v. ForestSearch
-
established in New York Times Co. v. SullivanSearch
-
Page 419 U. S. 249 II In Time, Inc. v. HillSearch
-
s experience in being held hostage by three escaped convicts. This Court, guided by its decision in New York Times Co. v. SullivanSearch
-
at 385 U. S. 394 . The District Judge in the case before us, in contrast to the trial judge in Time, Inc. v. HillSearch
-
of invasion of privacy, or whether the constitutional standard Page 419 U. S. 251 announced in Time, Inc. v. HillSearch
-
applies to all false light cases. Cf. Gertz v. RobertSearch
-
established by this Court in New York Times Co. v. SullivanSearch
-
s attitude toward the plaintiff's privacy, not toward the truth or falsity of the material published. See Time, Inc. v. HillSearch
-
damages. And, as his instructions to the jury made clear, the District Judge was fully aware that the Time, Inc. v. HillSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
It is clear, however, that both Ohio and West Virginia recognize a legally protected interest in privacy. E.g., Housh v. PethSearch
-
Roach v. HarperSearch
-
Sutherland v. KrogerSearch
-
In Time, Inc. v. HillSearch
-
to this instruction. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, dissenting. I adhere to the views which I expressed in Time, Inc. v. HillSearch
-
and Fourteenth Amendments by what we do today. This line of cases, which of course includes New York Times Co v. SullivanSearch
-
seems to me to place First Amendment rights of the press at a midway point similar to what our ill-fated Betts v. BradySearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Cantrell v. ForestSearch
-
II In Time, Inc. v. HillSearch
-
Cf. Gertz v. RobertSearch
-
See Time, Inc. v. HillSearch
-
the Time, Inc. v. HillSearch
-
E.g., Housh v. PethSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial