Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Schick Vs. Reed

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Dec 23, 1974

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

62 entries 8 linked 54 unlinked
Show
  1. Linkletter Vs. Walker US Supreme Court · Jun 07, 1965
  2. Kitchens Vs. Smith US Supreme Court · Apr 05, 1971
  3. Burgett Vs. Texas US Supreme Court · Nov 13, 1967
  4. United States Vs. Tucker US Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1972
  5. United States Vs. Wiltberger US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1820
  6. Mcconnell Vs. Rhay US Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1968
  7. Biddle Vs. Perovich US Supreme Court · May 31, 1927
  8. Trop Vs. Dulles US Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1958
  9. U.S. 256 (1974) U.S. Supreme Court Schick v. Reed
    Search
  10. U.S. 256 (1974) Schick v. Reed
    Search
  11. of Appeals affirmed, additionally rejecting petitioner's contention that this Court's intervening decision in Furman v. Georgia
    Search
  12. included the power to commute sentences on conditions not specifically authorized by statute. United States v. Wilson
    Search
  13. the Constitution alone, it cannot be modified, abridged, or diminished by any statute, including Art. 118, and Furman v. Georgia
    Search
  14. condition that the prisoner not be paroled. In addition, it rejected by a 2-1 vote petitioner's argument that Furman v. Georgia
    Search
  15. imposed by the court-martial. The essence of petitioner's case is that, in light of this Court's holding in Furman v. Georgia
    Search
  16. The few cases decided in this area are consistent with the view of the power described above. In United States v. Wilson
    Search
  17. to overturn it. Jackman v. Rosenbaum
    Search
  18. the President has constitutional power to attach conditions to his commutation of any sentence. Thus, even if Furman v. Georgia
    Search
  19. the no-parole condition of his commuted death sentence, paying only lip service to our intervening decision in Furman v. Georgia
    Search
  20. to give full retroactive effect to the Furman decision. Robinson v. Neil
    Search
  21. U. S. 505 , 409 U. S. 508 (1973). See Stewart v. Massachusetts
    Search
  22. Marks v. Louisiana
    Search
  23. Walker v. Georgia
    Search
  24. the adverse legal consequences, both direct and indirect, of prior constitutional violations. See, e.g., McConnell v. Rhay
    Search
  25. Page 419 U. S. 271 in the decisions on the right to counsel in state felony trials. See Pickelsimer v. Wainwright
    Search
  26. to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States except for cases of impeachment. Biddle v. Perovich
    Search
  27. he may not, under the aegis of that power, engage in lawmaking or adjudication. Cf. United States v. Benz
    Search
  28. Brazier v. Commissioner
    Search
  29. the primary resource for analyzing the scope of Art. II is our own republican system of government. See Grosjean v. American
    Search
  30. of Executive action to the statutory framework is not undermined by earlier decisions of this Court. In Biddle v. Perovich
    Search
  31. Bell v. United
    Search
  32. to the trial court, that punishment has been automatically imposed either by the appellate court itself, e.g., State v. Johnson
    Search
  33. Commonwealth v. Bradley
    Search
  34. Anderson v. State
    Search
  35. or by the trial judge on direction from the appellate court, e.g., Capler v. State
    Search
  36. State v. Square
    Search
  37. Garcia v. State
    Search
  38. Id. at 408 U. S. 417 -418. Beyond the language of Furman the Court has made clear in Trop v. Dulles
    Search
  39. the Bill of Rights and afforded its protection to the members of the Armed Forces. See, e.g., United States v. Tempia
    Search
  40. United States v. Jacoby
    Search
  41. United States v. Jobe
    Search
  42. the penalty is equally severe, and, in my view, equally offensive to the Eighth Amendment for that reason, see Furman v. Georgia
    Search
  43. that relieves the recipient of all the legal consequences of the conviction. See, e.g., United States ex rel. Brazier v. Commissioner
    Search
  44. Chapman v. Scott
    Search
  45. of the separation of powers doctrine so fervently embraced by the constitutional drafters. National Mutual Ins. Co. v. Tidewater
    Search
  46. United States v. Wilson
    Search
  47. U.S. Supreme Court Schick v. Reed
    Search
  48. Furman v. Georgia
    Search
  49. and Furman v. Georgia
    Search
  50. In United States v. Wilson
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial