Citation network
Gaffney Vs. Cummings
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 01, 1973
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 772 (1973) U.S. Supreme Court Gaffney V. CummingsSearch
-
U.S. 772 (1973) 412 U.S. 772 J. Brian GAFFNEY, Appellant, v. TheodoreSearch
-
R. CUMMINGS et al. Mark WHITE, Jr., et al., Appellants, v. DianaSearch
-
Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
See Whitcomb v. ChavisSearch
-
White v. RegesterSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
in our earlier cases, and I therefore must state my dissenting views. I At issue in No. 71-1476, Gaffney v. CummingsSearch
-
Mahan v. HowellSearch
-
Mahan v. HowellSearch
-
of Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
supra. The Texas reapportionment case, No. 72-147, White v. RegesterSearch
-
Abate v. MundtSearch
-
Kirkpatrick v. PreislerSearch
-
variances without regard to the circumstances of each particular case.' The Court reasons, however, that Kirkpatrick v. PreislerSearch
-
Mahan v. HowellSearch
-
Ely v. KlahrSearch
-
Kirkpatrick v. PreislerSearch
-
U.S. 526 () ( 1969), and Wells v. RockefellerSearch
-
Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
Kirkpatrick v. PreislerSearch
-
had satisfied this obligation. I would therefore affirm both judgments. Footnotes Footnote 1 In Fortson v. DorseySearch
-
See Lucas v. ColoradoSearch
-
U.S. 73, 88 , 1294 (1966), quoting from Fortson v. DorseySearch
-
Cf. Whitcomb v. ChavisSearch
-
Fair Representation v. TawesSearch
-
Lucas v. ColoradoSearch
-
Burns v. RichardsonSearch
-
Mahan v. HowellSearch
-
Court declined to indicate any awareness of the dispute. Footnote 4 There is a statement, to be sure, in Swann v. AdamsSearch
-
of a rational state policy.' 377 U.S. 533 , 579 (, 1391).' Ibid. Similarly, the Court noted, quoting from Roman v. SincockSearch
-
Swann v. AdamsSearch
-
are tolerable in the absence of any justification or explanation by the State. Footnote 5 By contrast, in Mahan v. HowellSearch
-
of Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
Mahan v. HowellSearch
-
Mahan v. HowellSearch
-
Abate v. MundtSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Gaffney V. CummingsSearch
-
J. Brian GAFFNEY, Appellant, v. TheodoreSearch
-
Appellants, v. DianaSearch
-
of Reynolds v. SimsSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial