Citation network
Couch Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 09, 1973
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Couch v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 409 U.S. 322 (1973) U.S. Supreme Court Couch v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 409 U.S. 322 (1973) Couch v. UnitedSearch
-
In Donaldson v. UnitedSearch
-
against compulsory self-incrimination has often been stated by this Court, and need not be elaborated. Counselman v. HitchcockSearch
-
part of the State to resort to the expedient of compelling incriminating evidence from one's own mouth. United States v. WhiteSearch
-
Ullmann v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 350 U. S. 422 , 350 U. S. 428 (1956). Page 409 U. S. 328 In Murphy v. WaterfrontSearch
-
Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Holt v. UnitedSearch
-
is involved. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSearch
-
of law enforcement and tax investigation. Page 409 U. S. 330 III Petitioner's reliance on Boyd v. UnitedSearch
-
Hill v. PhilpottSearch
-
United States v. JudsonSearch
-
United States v. WhiteSearch
-
Page 409 U. S. 332 In Perlman v. UnitedSearch
-
privilege exists under federal law, and no state-created privilege has been recognized in federal cases, Falsone v. UnitedSearch
-
Gariepy v. UnitedSearch
-
Himmelfarb v. UnitedSearch
-
Olender v. UnitedSearch
-
or Fifth Amendment purposes, an expectation of protected privacy or confidentiality. v. TheSearch
-
Lillian v. CouchSearch
-
of the parties became fixed when the summons was served, and the transfer did not alter them. See United States v. ZakutanskySearch
-
United States v. LyonSearch
-
United States v. CohenSearch
-
in the instant case. It is true, as petitioner argues, that the case turns somewhat on a discussion of governmental v. privateSearch
-
Id. at 256 U. S. 476 . In Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
Schwimmer v. UnitedSearch
-
a grand jury proceeding against a corporation where the attorney had stored his office files. See also United States v. GutermaSearch
-
See n 6, supra. The summons satisfied the requirements in United States v. PowellSearch
-
as explained above, the necessary expectation of privacy to launch a valid Fourth Amendment claim does not exist. Katz v. UnitedSearch
-
records over to a third person for custodial safekeeping rather than disclosure of the information, United States v. GutermaSearch
-
F.2d 344 (CA2 1959), cf. Schwimmer v. UnitedSearch
-
to one who turns records over to a third person at the inducement of the Government, Stuart v. UnitedSearch
-
Murphy v. WaterfrontSearch
-
Comm'n, 378 U. S. 52 , 378 U. S. 55 (1964), quoting United States v. GrunewaldSearch
-
tool of the ever-widening governmental invasion and oversight of our private lives. As I urged in dissent in Warden v. HaydenSearch
-
cannot be pigeonholed within one amendment or the other, thereby foreclosing consideration of related policies. Boyd v. UnitedSearch
-
in Entick v. CarringtonSearch
-
We confirmed in Murphy v. WaterfrontSearch
-
Page 409 U. S. 341 I defined what I believe to be the boundaries of this right to privacy in Warden v. HaydenSearch
-
more discussion than to note that we have not tolerated such penalties in the past. Cf. Uniformed Sanitation Men v. CommissionerSearch
-
not places, under the Fourth Amendment, Katz v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 389 U. S. 347 , 389 U. S. 353 . And, as already noted, Boyd v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial