Citation network
Robinson Vs. Neil
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 16, 1973
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 505 (1973) U.S. Supreme Court Robinson v. NeilSearch
-
U.S. 505 (1973) Robinson v. NeilSearch
-
Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Syllabus Waller V. FloridaSearch
-
in jeopardy for the same offense. In 1967, federal courts denied a similar request for habeas corpus relief. Robinson v. HendersonSearch
-
petitioner renewed his claims for habeas relief, basing his arguments on this Court's intervening decisions in Benton v. MarylandSearch
-
U. S. 784 (1969), and Waller v. FloridaSearch
-
The Sixth Circuit reversed (452 F.2d 370 (1971)), and we granted certiorari to decide the retroactivity of Waller v. FloridaSearch
-
guarantee that no person be twice put in jeopardy for the same offense was first held binding on the States in Benton v. MarylandSearch
-
supra. Our subsequent decision in Waller v. FloridaSearch
-
U.S. at 397 U. S. 395 . Prior to this Court's 1965 decision in Linkletter v. WalkerSearch
-
recognized a general rule of retrospective effect for the constitutional decisions of this Court, e.g., Norton v. ShelbySearch
-
S. 442 (1886), subject to limited exceptions of a nature such as those stated in Chicot County Drainage District v. BaxterSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
general rule of retroactivity Page 409 U. S. 508 in a decision announcing that the exclusionary rule of Mapp v. OhioSearch
-
at 381 U. S. 639 . In terms of some nonprocedural guarantees, this test is simply not appropriate. In Furman v. GeorgiaSearch
-
to apply it retrospectively without regard to whether the rule meets the Linkletter criteria. E.g., Walker v. GeorgiaSearch
-
line of cases. Although the Court has not handed down a fully reasoned opinion on the retroactivity of Benton v. MarylandSearch
-
it has indicated that it is retroactive without examination of the Linkletter criteria. North Carolina v. PearceSearch
-
but to have been directed instead to collateral purposes such as the deterrence of unlawful police conduct, Mapp v. OhioSearch
-
not related to trial procedure, as indeed this case when contrasted with Furman illustrates. In Furman v. GeorgiaSearch
-
that the analogy between state and municipal prosecutions, and federal and state prosecutions permitted in Bartkus v. IllinoisSearch
-
and was not analytically sound. Since the issue did not assume federal constitutional proportions until after Benton v. MarylandSearch
-
of a nonprocedural constitutional decision such as Waller. We hold, therefore, that our decision in Waller v. FloridaSearch
-
See Desist v. UnitedSearch
-
Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment, which is applicable to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment, Benton v. MarylandSearch
-
Grubb v. OklahomaSearch
-
Harris v. WashingtonSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Robinson v. NeilSearch
-
Robinson v. HendersonSearch
-
and Waller v. FloridaSearch
-
of Waller v. FloridaSearch
-
Linkletter v. WalkerSearch
-
Norton v. ShelbySearch
-
Chicot County Drainage District v. BaxterSearch
-
of Mapp v. OhioSearch
-
In Furman v. GeorgiaSearch
-
E.g., Walker v. GeorgiaSearch
-
of Benton v. MarylandSearch
-
Mapp v. OhioSearch
-
the Fourteenth Amendment, Benton v. MarylandSearch
-
Grubb v. OklahomaSearch
-
Benton v. MarylandSearch
-
Waller v. FloridaSearch
-
Bartkus v. IllinoisSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial