Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

United States Vs. Fuller

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 16, 1973

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

40 entries 3 linked 37 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Rands US Supreme Court · Nov 13, 1967
    Distinguished
  2. United States Vs. Cors US Supreme Court · Jun 13, 1949
  3. United States Vs. Cox US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1837
    Relied / Followed
  4. U.S. 488 (1973) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Fuller
    Search
  5. U.S. 488 (1973) United States v. Fuller
    Search
  6. the District Court. 442 F.2d 504. Page 409 U. S. 490 That court followed the earlier case of United States v. Jaramillo
    Search
  7. F.2d 300 (CA10 1951), and distinguished our holding in United States v. Rands
    Search
  8. when the Government exercises its power of eminent domain. The owner is entitled to fair market value, United States v. Miller
    Search
  9. United States v. Virginia
    Search
  10. of just compensation derives as much content from the basic equitable principles of fairness, United States v. Commodities
    Search
  11. increment of value resulting from such combination may be taken into consideration in valuing the parcel taken. Olson v. United
    Search
  12. is not the end of the inquiry. In United States v. Miller
    Search
  13. U.S. at 317 U. S. 374 . United States v. Cors
    Search
  14. conferred by access to such benefits as a potential port site or a potential hydro-electric site. United States v. Rands
    Search
  15. United States v. Twin
    Search
  16. United States v. Commodore
    Search
  17. We do not suggest that such a general principle can be pushed to its ultimate logical conclusion. In United States v. Miller
    Search
  18. the exercise of its lease power, have diminished that value without paying compensation. United States ex rel. TVA v. Powelson
    Search
  19. United States v. Miller
    Search
  20. U.S. at 389 U. S. 125 , quoting United States v. Twin
    Search
  21. be paid for even though, in the absence of such provision, the Constitution would not require payment. United States v. Gerlach
    Search
  22. of range lands. Hatahley v. United
    Search
  23. Government exercises its power of eminent domain is ordinarily the market value of the property taken. United States v. Miller
    Search
  24. do this. Neither of the lines of cases on which the Court relies seems apposite. The first includes United States v. Miller
    Search
  25. value occasioned Page 409 U. S. 499 by the very project for which the land was condemned, and United States v. Cors
    Search
  26. Government undertaking which led to the condemnation. The other cases on which the Court relies, United States v. Rands
    Search
  27. U. S. 121 (1967), and United States v. Twin
    Search
  28. of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit followed a similar analysis in awarding location value in one case, United States v. Jaramillo
    Search
  29. F.2d 300 (1951), but not in the other, United States v. Cox
    Search
  30. U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Fuller
    Search
  31. of United States v. Jaramillo
    Search
  32. United States v. Commodities
    Search
  33. Olson v. United
    Search
  34. In United States v. Miller
    Search
  35. TVA v. Powelson
    Search
  36. United States v. Gerlach
    Search
  37. Hatahley v. United
    Search
  38. and United States v. Cors
    Search
  39. and United States v. Twin
    Search
  40. United States v. Jaramillo
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial