Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Gomez Vs. Perez

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 17, 1973

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

33 entries 1 linked 32 unlinked
Show
  1. Carrington Vs. Rash US Supreme Court · Mar 01, 1965
  2. U.S. 535 (1973) U.S. Supreme Court Gomez v. Perez
    Search
  3. U.S. 535 (1973) Gomez v. Perez
    Search
  4. while granting it to legitimate children violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Cf. Levy v. Louisiana
    Search
  5. Weber v. Aetna
    Search
  6. of the State, the natural father has a continuing and primary duty to support his legitimate children. See Lane v. Phillips
    Search
  7. Hooten v. Hooten
    Search
  8. The duty to support exists despite the fact that the father may not have custody of the child. Hooten v. Hooten
    Search
  9. unlike legitimate children, have no legal right to support from their fathers. See also Home of the Holy Infancy v. Kaska
    Search
  10. Lane v. Phillips
    Search
  11. Bjorgo v. Bjorgo
    Search
  12. fathers may set up illegitimacy as a defense to prosecutions for criminal nonsupport of their children. See Curtin v. State
    Search
  13. Beaver v. State
    Search
  14. Page 409 U. S. 538 death of a parent and exclude illegitimate children from the benefit of such a right. Levy v. Louisiana
    Search
  15. equally with other children in the recovery of workmen's compensation benefits for the death of their parent. Weber v. Aetna
    Search
  16. neither can they be made into an impenetrable barrier that works to shield otherwise invidious discrimination. Stanley v. Illinois
    Search
  17. issues presented in the case. Mishkin v. New
    Search
  18. her child was being denied equal protection of laws is, therefore, properly before us in any event. See also Davis v. Richardson
    Search
  19. Griffin v. Richardson
    Search
  20. of their biological fathers, denied equal protection to illegitimate children under the principles of Weber v. Aetna
    Search
  21. Glona v. American
    Search
  22. and Levy v. Louisiana
    Search
  23. and failed to provide this Court with a sufficient understanding of Texas law with respect to such matters as custodial v. noncustodial
    Search
  24. U.S. Supreme Court Gomez v. Perez
    Search
  25. the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Cf. Levy v. Louisiana
    Search
  26. See Lane v. Phillips
    Search
  27. Home of the Holy Infancy v. Kaska
    Search
  28. See Curtin v. State
    Search
  29. Levy v. Louisiana
    Search
  30. Stanley v. Illinois
    Search
  31. Mishkin v. New
    Search
  32. Davis v. Richardson
    Search
  33. of Weber v. Aetna
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial