Citation network
Goosby Vs. Osser
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 17, 1973
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 512 (1973) U.S. Supreme Court Goosby v. OsserSearch
-
U.S. 512 (1973) Goosby v. OsserSearch
-
affirmed on the ground that petitioners' constitutional claims were wholly insubstantial under McDonald v. BoardSearch
-
that, in the view of the Court of Appeals, petitioners' constitutional claims were wholly insubstantial under McDonald v. BoardSearch
-
U. S. 802 (1969), in which circumstance, Page 409 U. S. 516 the Court of Appeals held, Bailey v. PattersonSearch
-
Liverpool, N. Y. & P. S.S. Co. v. CommissionersSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
United Public Workers of America v. MitchellSearch
-
Page 409 U. S. 518 II The Court of Appeals also erred. We disagree with its holding that McDonald v. BoardSearch
-
Hannis Distilling Co. v. BaltimoreSearch
-
Ex parte Poresky, supra, at 290 U. S. 32 , quoting from Hannis Distilling Co. v. BaltimoreSearch
-
Levering & Garrigues Co. v. MorrinSearch
-
McGilvra v. RossSearch
-
state interest test when either a fundamental right, such as the right to vote, was allegedly infringed, Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
Harper v. VirginiaSearch
-
or when the statutory classifications were drawn on the basis of suspect criteria, such as wealth or race, Harper v. VirginiaSearch
-
convening of a three-judge court to hear and determine the merits of petitioners' constitutional claims, see Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSearch
-
Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. PageSearch
-
Borden Co. v. LiddySearch
-
Riss Co. v. HochSearch
-
if deemed appropriate, to abstain from such determination pending state court proceedings. See Lake Carriers' Assn. v. MacMullanSearch
-
presidential election, have been held since this action was filed, but this does not render the case moot. See Moore v. OgilvieSearch
-
have lost their status as class members by being released on bail, discharged, acquitted, or convicted. See McDonald v. BoardSearch
-
Lee v. WashingtonSearch
-
error and represents that the error will be corrected without need for further court action. See, e.g., Titmus v. TinsleySearch
-
McKissick v. DurhamSearch
-
Jeffers v. WhitleySearch
-
Kelley v. BoardSearch
-
the absence of a case or controversy on the alleged difficulty of formulating a remedy, he also erred. See Louisiana v. UnitedSearch
-
Brown v. BoardSearch
-
and (4) those who served as poll watchers in precincts other than their own on election day. See McDonald v. BoardSearch
-
present procedural posture of petitioners' case, the allegations of their complaint must be deemed to be true. Boddie v. ConnecticutSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Goosby v. OsserSearch
-
McDonald v. BoardSearch
-
Levering & Garrigues Co. v. MorrinSearch
-
See Lake Carriers' Assn. v. MacMullanSearch
-
See Moore v. OgilvieSearch
-
See McDonald v. BoardSearch
-
Titmus v. TinsleySearch
-
See Louisiana v. UnitedSearch
-
Bailey v. PattersonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial