Citation network
Epa Vs. Mink
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 22, 1973
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 73 (1973) U.S. Supreme Court EPA v. MinkSearch
-
U.S. 73 (1973) Environmental Protection Agency v. MinkSearch
-
whatever limitations the Executive privilege may be held to impose upon such congressional ordering. Cf. United States v. ReynoldsSearch
-
Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
F.Supp. at 946. Thus, in the absence of a claim that disclosure would jeopardize state secrets, see United States v. ReynoldsSearch
-
of all documents is not a necessary or inevitable tool in every case. Others are available. Cf. United States v. ReynoldsSearch
-
A separate action was brought to enjoin the test itself. Committee for Nuclear Responsibility v. SeaborgSearch
-
for an injunction in this Court. On November 6, 1971, we denied the application, Committee for Nuclear Responsibility v. SchlesingerSearch
-
over the issue of Executive privilege. See Chief Justice Marshall's decisions in the trial of United States v. BurrSearch
-
Different rules have been held to apply in each situation. See, e.g., United States v. AndolschekSearch
-
Bank Line, Ltd. v. UnitedSearch
-
Machin v. ZuckertSearch
-
Boeing Airplane Co. v. CoggeshallSearch
-
Olson Rug Co. v. NLRBSearch
-
Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. V.ESearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
McFadden v. AvcoSearch
-
Corp., 278 F.Supp. 57, 59-60 (MD Ala.1967), and cases cited therein. In United States v. CottonSearch
-
Boeing Airplane Co. v. CogeshallSearch
-
O'Keefe v. BoeingSearch
-
Rosee v. BoardSearch
-
Valley Operators Comm., supra, (civil antitrust suit). Cf. United States v. ProcterSearch
-
p. 812. In Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
Soucie v. DavidSearch
-
Grumman Aircraft Eng. Corp. v. RenegotiationSearch
-
Bristol-Myers Co. v. FTCSearch
-
International Paper Co. v. FPCSearch
-
General Services Admin. v. BensonSearch
-
Long Island R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Consumers Union v. VeteransSearch
-
Olsen v. CampSearch
-
Reliable Transfer Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Cowles Communications v. DepartmentSearch
-
of Justice, 325 F.Supp. 726, 727 (ND Cal.1971). Accord, Frankel v. SECSearch
-
Philadelphia Newspapers v. HUDSearch
-
Soucie v. DavidSearch
-
Wellford v. HardinSearch
-
See Schwegmann Bros. v. CalvertSearch
-
b)(1), petitioners rely upon Epstein v. ResorSearch
-
No. 813, 89th Cong., 1st Sess., 9. And the courts have uniformly agreed on that construction of the Act. See Soucie v. DavidSearch
-
perhaps for decades, the footprints of a nervous bureaucrat or a wary executive. I repeat what I said in Gravel v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court EPA v. MinkSearch
-
Environmental Protection Agency v. MinkSearch
-
Cf. United States v. ReynoldsSearch
-
Nuclear Responsibility v. SeaborgSearch
-
Nuclear Responsibility v. SchlesingerSearch
-
of United States v. BurrSearch
-
United States v. AndolschekSearch
-
Machin v. ZuckertSearch
-
In United States v. CottonSearch
-
Cf. United States v. ProcterSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial