Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

United States Vs. Basye

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Feb 27, 1973

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

32 entries 6 linked 26 unlinked
Show
  1. Commissioner Vs. Culbertson US Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1949
  2. Helvering Vs. Eubank US Supreme Court · Nov 25, 1940
  3. Burnet Vs. Leininger US Supreme Court · Mar 14, 1932
  4. Bingler Vs. Johnson US Supreme Court · Apr 23, 1969
  5. Lucas Vs. Earl US Supreme Court · Mar 17, 1930
  6. Heiner Vs. Mellon US Supreme Court · May 16, 1938
  7. U.S. 441 (1973) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Basye
    Search
  8. U.S. 441 (1973) United States v. Basye
    Search
  9. The seminal precedent, written over 40 years ago, is Mr. Justice Holmes' opinion for a unanimous Court in Lucas v. Earl
    Search
  10. Id. at 281 U. S. 114 -115. The principle of Lucas v. Earl
    Search
  11. invoked by this Court, and stands today as a cornerstone of our graduated income tax system. See, e.g., Commissioner v. Harmon
    Search
  12. Page 410 U. S. 451 United States v. Joliet
    Search
  13. a portion of the partnership compensation was deflected to the retirement fund, is certainly within the ambit of Lucas v. Earl
    Search
  14. know of no authority imposing this burden upon the Government. Nor do we believe that the guiding principle of Lucas v. Earl
    Search
  15. share of the partnership's income without regard to whether that amount is actually distributed to him. Heiner v. Mellon
    Search
  16. Hulbert v. Commissioner
    Search
  17. Bell v. Commissioner
    Search
  18. Stewart v. United
    Search
  19. Freudmann v. Commissioner
    Search
  20. do not contend that such payments were gifts or some other type of nontaxable contribution. See Commissioner v. LoBue
    Search
  21. Respondents contend in this Court that this case is controlled by Commissioner v. First
    Search
  22. programs having contingent and forfeitable features are not taxable until received, are inapposite. Schaefer v. Bowers
    Search
  23. Perkins v. Commissioner
    Search
  24. Robertson v. Commissioner
    Search
  25. U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Basye
    Search
  26. of Lucas v. Earl
    Search
  27. Commissioner v. Harmon
    Search
  28. United States v. Joliet
    Search
  29. Hulbert v. Commissioner
    Search
  30. See Commissioner v. LoBue
    Search
  31. Commissioner v. First
    Search
  32. Schaefer v. Bowers
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial