Citation network
Ohio Vs. Kentucky
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 05, 1973
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 641 (1973) U.S. Supreme Court Ohio v. KentuckySearch
-
U.S. 641 (1973) Ohio v. KentuckySearch
-
of a brief in opposition, permit and enable us to dispose of matters at a preliminary stage. See, for example, Alabama v. TexasSearch
-
California v. WashingtonSearch
-
Virginia v. WestSearch
-
for the subject matter of Ohio's proposed amendment is barred as a matter of law. II In Handly's Lessee v. AnthonySearch
-
border, has been Page 410 U. S. 647 consistently adhered to in subsequent decisions of this Court. Indiana v. KentuckySearch
-
Henderson Bridge Co. v. HendersonSearch
-
U. S. 113 (1918). It has been explicitly recognized by the Supreme Court of Ohio in Booth v. ShepherdSearch
-
Lessee of McCullock v. AtenSearch
-
Lessee of Blanchard v. PorterSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
See Commonwealth v. GarnerSearch
-
sense. But proceedings under this Court's original jurisdiction are basically equitable in nature, Rhode Island v. MassachusettsSearch
-
Pet. 210 (1840), and a claim not technically precluded nonetheless may be foreclosed by acquiescence. Indiana v. KentuckySearch
-
Michigan v. WisconsinSearch
-
U. S. 295 , 308 (1926). To like effect are Vermont v. NewSearch
-
Maryland v. WestSearch
-
Louisiana v. MississippiSearch
-
Virginia v. TennesseeSearch
-
There is a possible intimation to the contrary in the bridge tax case of Covington & Cincinnati Bridge Co. v. MayerSearch
-
on the content of the bridge company's Ohio charter granting permission for the erection of the bridge. See Sebastian v. CovingtonSearch
-
See Indiana v. KentuckySearch
-
Commonwealth v. HendersonSearch
-
Louisville Sand & Gravel Co. v. RalstonSearch
-
Shannon v. StreckfusSearch
-
McFarland v. McKnightSearch
-
Church v. ChambersSearch
-
Fleming v. KenneySearch
-
McFall v. CommonwealthSearch
-
when the States' boundary dispute has been open, continuous and of long standing. See, for example, New Jersey v. DelawareSearch
-
Oklahoma v. TexasSearch
-
Arkansas v. TennesseeSearch
-
the 19th century, this Court dealt with the nature of the Kentucky-Indiana boundary in two cases. Handly's Lessee v. AnthonySearch
-
Wheat. 374 (1820), and Indiana v. KentuckySearch
-
Lessee of McCullock v. AtenSearch
-
Booth v. ShepherdSearch
-
In the case of Handly's Lessee v. AnthonySearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Ohio v. KentuckySearch
-
Alabama v. TexasSearch
-
II In Handly's Lessee v. AnthonySearch
-
Court. Indiana v. KentuckySearch
-
Vermont v. NewSearch
-
of Covington & Cincinnati Bridge Co. v. MayerSearch
-
See Sebastian v. CovingtonSearch
-
and Indiana v. KentuckySearch
-
of Handly's Lessee v. AnthonySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial