Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Bradley Vs. United States

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 05, 1973

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

33 entries 4 linked 29 unlinked
Show
  1. Norris Vs. Crocker US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1851
  2. Mempa Vs. Rhay US Supreme Court · Nov 13, 1967
  3. Hill Vs. Wampler US Supreme Court · May 18, 1936
  4. Southern Pacific Co. Vs. Jensen US Supreme Court · May 21, 1917
  5. Bradley v. United
    Search
  6. States - 410 U.S. 605 (1973) U.S. Supreme Court Bradley v. United
    Search
  7. States, 410 U.S. 605 (1973) Bradley v. United
    Search
  8. U.S. 908 (1972), in order to resolve the conflict between the First and Ninth Circuits, see United States v. Stephens
    Search
  9. all prosecutions which had not reached final disposition in the highest court authorized to review them. See Bell v. Maryland
    Search
  10. n. 2 (3d ed.1943). And the rule applied even when the penalty was reduced. See, e.g., The King v. M'Kenzie
    Search
  11. Beard v. State
    Search
  12. Henry v. United
    Search
  13. clearly imports a beginning and an end. Cf. Kirby v. Illinois
    Search
  14. U. S. 128 (1967). In Berman v. United
    Search
  15. Final judgment in a criminal case means sentence. The sentence is the judgment. Miller v. Aderhold
    Search
  16. U. S. 212 . In the legal sense, a prosecution terminates only when sentence is imposed. See also Korematsu v. United
    Search
  17. Affronti v. United
    Search
  18. United States v. McGarr
    Search
  19. United States v. Fiotto
    Search
  20. a) of the 1970 Act was, in my view, the one given by the Court of Appeals of the Ninth Circuit in United States v. Stephens
    Search
  21. and abatement of proceedings has been avoided. At that point, litigation has ended, and appeal is available. Korematsu v United
    Search
  22. is not often rationalized. The most dramatic illustration, at least in modern times, is illustrated by Rosenberg v. United
    Search
  23. U.S. Supreme Court Bradley v. United
    Search
  24. United States v. Stephens
    Search
  25. See Bell v. Maryland
    Search
  26. The King v. M'Kenzie
    Search
  27. Cf. Kirby v. Illinois
    Search
  28. In Berman v. United
    Search
  29. Miller v. Aderhold
    Search
  30. Korematsu v. United
    Search
  31. United States v. McGarr
    Search
  32. Rosenberg v. United
    Search
  33. United States v. Murray
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial