Citation network
Hurtado Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 05, 1973
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Hurtado v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 410 U.S. 578 (1973) U.S. Supreme Court Hurtado v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 410 U.S. 578 (1973) Hurtado v. UnitedSearch
-
require that the Government pay for the performance of a public duty it is already owed. See Monongahela Bridge Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. HobbsSearch
-
United States v. DillonSearch
-
Roodenko v. UnitedSearch
-
Kunhardt Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U. S. 540 . It is beyond dispute that there is in fact, a public obligation to provide evidence, see United States v. BryanSearch
-
Blackmer v. UnitedSearch
-
Blair v. UnitedSearch
-
as we have construed it are so irrational as to violate the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Cf. Bolling v. SharpeSearch
-
Hunter v. RussellSearch
-
Whipple v. CumberlandSearch
-
Hance v. McCormickSearch
-
Arenas v. UnitedSearch
-
Sartor v. ArkansasSearch
-
See Stein v. NewSearch
-
Barry v. UnitedSearch
-
a-day payment is so low as to impose involuntary servitude prohibited by the Thirteenth Amendment. Cf. Griffin v. BreckenridgeSearch
-
Jones v. AlfredSearch
-
the Court, would be invalid under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Bolling Page 410 U. S. 596 v. SharpeSearch
-
S. 598 has used in imposing a cut-off is sufficiently rational to withstand constitutional attack. Cf. Dandrige v. WilliamsSearch
-
least limited invasion of his personal liberty to fulfill his public obligation to provide evidence. See United States v. BryanSearch
-
discrimination against the poverty-stricken cannot be supported by some speculative rational justification. Ortwein v. SchwabSearch
-
See Boddie v. ConnecticutSearch
-
petitioners sacrifice their time waiting to testify whether or not court is in session. Griffin v. IllinoisSearch
-
the laws if he is barred from appealing on equal terms with other defendants solely because of his indigence. In Bandy v. UnitedSearch
-
if the statute is to be measured as it applies to aliens, it surely creates a suspect classification. See Takahashi v. FishSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Hurtado v. UnitedSearch
-
See Monongahela Bridge Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Kunhardt Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Cf. Bolling v. SharpeSearch
-
Hunter v. RussellSearch
-
the Thirteenth Amendment. Cf. Griffin v. BreckenridgeSearch
-
Cf. Dandrige v. WilliamsSearch
-
See United States v. BryanSearch
-
Griffin v. IllinoisSearch
-
In Bandy v. UnitedSearch
-
See Takahashi v. FishSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial