Citation network
Rosario Vs. Rockefeller
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 21, 1973
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U.S. 752 (1973) U.S. Supreme Court Rosario v. RockefellerSearch
-
U.S. 752 (1973) Rosario v. RockefellerSearch
-
as violative of the Equal Protection Clause, state statutes that disenfranchised certain groups of people. Carrington v. RashSearch
-
Kramer v. UnionSearch
-
Cipriano v. CitySearch
-
It is clear that preservation of the integrity of the electoral process is a legitimate and valid state goal. Cf. Dunn v. BlumsteinSearch
-
enrollment is thus tied to a particularized legitimate purpose, and is in no sense invidious or arbitrary. Cf. Lippitt v. CipolloneSearch
-
establishes a durational residence requirement unconstitutional under Dunn v. BlumsteinSearch
-
U. S. 330 (1972), and violates the right to travel under Shapiro v. ThompsonSearch
-
to vote, once the State has decided to make it available to some, becomes a basic one under the Constitution. Dunn v. BlumsteinSearch
-
Self-expression through the public ballot equally with one's peers is the essence of a democratic society. Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
on this right, as well as on the closely related right to associate with the party of one's choice. See Williams v. RhodesSearch
-
Harper v. VirginiaSearch
-
is sufficient to establish a constitutional violation, Dunn v. BlumsteinSearch
-
supra, at 377 U. S. 561 -562. See also Yick Wo v. HopkinsSearch
-
Voting in a party primary is as protected against state encroachment as voting in a general election. Bullock v. CarterSearch
-
supra, at 405 U. S. 337 , quoting Kramer v. UnionSearch
-
School District, supra, at 395 U. S. 627 (emphasis added in Dunn ). See also Cipriano v. CitySearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Rosario v. RockefellerSearch
-
Cf. Dunn v. BlumsteinSearch
-
Cf. Lippitt v. CipolloneSearch
-
Shapiro v. ThompsonSearch
-
the Constitution. Dunn v. BlumsteinSearch
-
See Williams v. RhodesSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial