Citation network
Mescalero Apache Tribe Vs. Jones
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 27, 1973
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 145 (1973) U.S. Supreme Court Mescalero Apache Tribe v. JonesSearch
-
U.S. 145 (1973) Mescalero Apache Tribe v. JonesSearch
-
subject have become particularly treacherous. The conceptual clarity of Chief Justice Marshall's view in Worcester v. GeorgiaSearch
-
as they, taken together, affect the respective rights of States, Indians, and the Federal Government. See McClanahan v. ArizonaSearch
-
Williams v. LeeSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Draper v. UnitedSearch
-
reservation lands or Indian income from activities carried on within the boundaries of the reservation, and McClanahan v. ArizonaSearch
-
subject to nondiscriminatory state law otherwise applicable to all citizens of the State. See, e.g., Puyallup Tribe v. DepartmentSearch
-
Shaw v. Gibson-ZahniserSearch
-
Ward v. RaceSearch
-
U. S. 504 (1896). That principle is as relevant to a State's tax laws as it is to state criminal laws, see Ward v. RaceSearch
-
reservation ski resort a federal instrumentality constitutionally immune from state taxes of all sorts. M'Culloch v. MarylandSearch
-
its rise and decline in Indian affairs is described and reflected in Helvering v. MountainSearch
-
Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. UnitedSearch
-
and Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. TexasSearch
-
Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. TexasSearch
-
Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf R. Co. v. MackeySearch
-
U. S. 531 , 256 U. S. 536 (1921). See also Henderson Bridge Co. v. KentuckySearch
-
Department of Employment v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 385 U. S. 355 , 385 U. S. 359 -360 (1966). Cf. Clallam County v. UnitedSearch
-
the reach of state law. See also Puyallup Tribe, 391 U.S. at 391 U. S. 398 . What was said in Shaw v. Gibson-ZahnerSearch
-
Page 411 U. S. 156 to support an exemption for taxation on income derived from the land. See Squire v. CapoemanSearch
-
Superior Bath House Co. v. McCarrollSearch
-
States, 319 U.S. at 319 U. S. 606 -607. See Squire v. CapoemanSearch
-
oil lands is subject to the federal income tax although the source of the income may be exempt from tax. Choteau v. BurnetSearch
-
Government, may tax an Indian's pro rata share of income from a tribe's restricted mineral resources. Leahy v. StateSearch
-
U. S. 420 (1936). Lessees of otherwise exempt Indian lands are also subject to state taxation. Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. TexasSearch
-
Tribe's tax exempt land would certainly be immune from the State's ad valorem property tax. See United States v. RickertSearch
-
use tax on the property. The jurisdictional basis for use taxes is the use of the property in the State. See Henneford v. SilasSearch
-
is a tax upon the property itself. Henneford v. SilasSearch
-
that use taxes are, for all purposes, to be deemed simple ad valorem property taxes. See, e.g., United States v. DetroitSearch
-
Sullivan v. UnitedSearch
-
does not alter the obvious effect of the State's admission legislation. See, e.g., Organized Village of Kake v. EarlSearch
-
The claim of tax immunity was made by a non-Indian lessee, under the rule of Gillespie v. OklahomaSearch
-
U. S. 501 (1922), which was itself overruled in Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. TexasSearch
-
law, although its result was altered by statute, as Congress was free to do. See generally Board of County Comm'rs v. SeberSearch
-
from taxation by virtue of its status as a lessee of land owned by the Federal Government. See, e.g., United States v. DetroitSearch
-
James v. DravoSearch
-
Helvering v. MountainSearch
-
that it reached acts even off Indian reservations in areas normally subject to the police power of the States. Perring v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial