Citation network
Lemon Vs. Kurtzman
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 02, 1973
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 192 (1973) U.S. Supreme Court Lemon v. KurtzmanSearch
-
U.S. 192 (1973) Lemon v. KurtzmanSearch
-
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Syllabus Following this Court's invalidation in Lemon v. KurtzmanSearch
-
the three-judge District Court for further Page 411 U. S. 194 proceedings consistent with our opinion. Lemon v. KurtzmanSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
case should be applied to convictions of others that predated the new constitutional development. E.g., Robinson v. NeilSearch
-
Adams v. IllinoisSearch
-
Desist v. UnitedSearch
-
Johnson v. NewSearch
-
Hanover Shoe v. UnitedSearch
-
Simpson v. UnionSearch
-
England v. StateSearch
-
to the validity of municipal financing founded upon electoral procedures later declared unconstitutional, Cipriano v. CitySearch
-
of Houma, 395 U. S. 701 (1969), and City of Phoenix v. KolodziejskiSearch
-
or to the validity of elections for local officials held under possibly discriminatory voting laws, Allen v. StateSearch
-
Norton v. ShelbySearch
-
Chicot County Drainage Dist. v. BaxterSearch
-
S. 200 the District Court's evaluation of the proper means of implementing an equitable decree. Cf. United States v. EstateSearch
-
appellate review is correspondingly narrow. Swann v. Charlotte-MecklenburgSearch
-
Brown v. BoardSearch
-
U. S. 321 , 321 U. S. 329 -330 (1944). See also Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSearch
-
established that reliance interest weigh heavily in the shaping of an appropriate equitable remedy. City of Phoenix v. KolodziejskiSearch
-
Cipriano v. CitySearch
-
Allen v. StateSearch
-
San Antonio School District v. RodriguezSearch
-
Federalism suggests that federal court intervention in State judicial processes be appropriately confined. See Younger v. HarrisSearch
-
In Linkletter v. WalkerSearch
-
citing Great Northern R. Co. v. SunburstSearch
-
See Lemon v. KurtzmanSearch
-
of state involvement in religious schools, with the analysis based upon the facts and circumstances before us. Tilton v. RichardsonSearch
-
Walz v. TaxSearch
-
Everson v. BoardSearch
-
Amendment, made applicable to the States by virtue of the Fourteenth. We said in unequivocal words in Everson v. BoardSearch
-
We reiterated the same idea in Zorach v. ClausonSearch
-
U. S. 306 , 343 U. S. 314 , in McGowan v. MarylandSearch
-
U. S. 420 , 366 U. S. 443 , and in Torcaso v. WatkinsSearch
-
U. S. 488 , 367 U. S. 493 . We repeated the same idea in McCollum v. BoardSearch
-
the newly announced rule goes to the fairness of the trial that had been completed under the old rule. See Johnson v. NewSearch
-
authority may at times deny a litigant due process if applied retroactively. See Brinkerhoff-Faris Trust & Savings Co. v. HillSearch
-
judicial ruling to prospective applications. The disruptive effect in criminal law enforcement is one example. Stovall v. DennoSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial