Citation network
Frontiero Vs. Richardson
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 14, 1973
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 677 (1973) U.S. Supreme Court Frontiero v. RichardsonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U.S. 677 (1973) Frontiero v. RichardsonSearch
-
STEWART concluded that the challenged statutes work an invidious discrimination in violation of the Constitution. Reed v. ReedSearch
-
BLACKMUN, while agreeing that the statutes deprive servicewomen of due process, concluded that, in the light of Reed v. ReedSearch
-
and, indeed, find at least implicit support for such an approach in our unanimous decision only last Term in Reed v. ReedSearch
-
and bears no rational relationship to a legitimate governmental interest. See Jefferson v. HackneySearch
-
Bradwell v. StateSearch
-
Weber v. AetnaSearch
-
S. 688 branch of Government is not without significance to the question presently under consideration. Cf. Oregon v. MitchellSearch
-
Katzenbach v. MoranSearch
-
is not a shibboleth, the mere recitation of which dictates constitutionality. See Shapiro v. ThompsonSearch
-
judgment, agreeing that the statutes before us work an invidious discrimination in violation of the Constitution. Reed v. ReedSearch
-
MR. JUSTICE REHNQUIST dissents for the reasons stated by Judge Rives in his opinion for the District Court, Frontiero v. LairdSearch
-
Shapiro v. ThompsonSearch
-
See Loving v. VirginiaSearch
-
See Graham v. RichardsonSearch
-
See Oyama v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Korematsu v. UnitedSearch
-
Hirabayashi v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief for Appellee in No. 70-4, O.T. 1971, Reed v. ReedSearch
-
Dunn v. BlumsteinSearch
-
Kramer v. UnionSearch
-
statutes are not in any sense designed to rectify the effects of past discrimination against women. See Gruenwald v. GardnerSearch
-
Jones v. AlfredSearch
-
of this past discrimination as a justification for heaping on additional economic disadvantages. Cf. Gaston County v. UnitedSearch
-
the statutory schemes except insofar as they require a female member to prove the dependency of her spouse. See Weber v. AetnaSearch
-
Moritz v. CommissionerSearch
-
characterize sex as a suspect classification, with all of the far-reaching implications of such a holding. Reed v. ReedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Frontiero v. RichardsonSearch
-
of the Constitution. Reed v. ReedSearch
-
of Reed v. ReedSearch
-
See Jefferson v. HackneySearch
-
Cf. Oregon v. MitchellSearch
-
the District Court, Frontiero v. LairdSearch
-
Shapiro v. ThompsonSearch
-
See Gruenwald v. GardnerSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial