Citation network
Michigan Vs. Payne
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 21, 1973
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 47 (1973) U.S. Supreme Court Michigan v. PayneSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U.S. 47 (1973) Michigan v. PayneSearch
-
due process limitations established by North Carolina v. PearceSearch
-
certiorari was granted in this case, 409 U.S. 911 (1972), to decide whether the due process holding of North Carolina v. PearceSearch
-
conviction but rejected the higher sentence as violative of the due process restrictions established in North Carolina v. PearceSearch
-
Chaffin v. StylchcombeSearch
-
U. S. 293 , 388 U. S. 297 (1967). See also Linkletter v. WalkerSearch
-
Johnson v. NewSearch
-
See James v. ConnerSearch
-
of one aspect of the judicial process. McConnell v. RhaySearch
-
of the sentencing phase of the criminal process. In this protective role, Pearce is analogous to Miranda v. ArizonaSearch
-
to preserve the integrity of a phase of the criminal process. Because of this similarity, we find that Johnson v. NewSearch
-
U. S. 719 (1966), which held Miranda nonretroactive, provides considerable guidance here. See also Jenkins v. DelawareSearch
-
Adams v. IllinoisSearch
-
Desist v. UnitedSearch
-
S. 56 generally enjoyed a wide discretion in terms of the factors they might legitimately consider. See Williams v. NewSearch
-
certiorari to resolve this question, but on each occasion the writ was dismissed as improvidently granted. Moon v. MarylandSearch
-
Odom v. UnitedSearch
-
constitutional requirements in cases in which it holds any such decisions nonretroactive. See Stovall v. DennoSearch
-
U. S. 293 (1967) (holding United States v. WadeSearch
-
U. S. 218 (1967), and Gilbert v. CaliforniaSearch
-
whether those cases were applicable to pre-formal accusation confrontations, a question later decided in Kirby v. IllinoisSearch
-
U. S. 631 (1968) (holding Duncan v. LouisianaSearch
-
U. S. 145 (1968), and Bloom v. IllinoisSearch
-
offense requiring trial by jury, a question later decided in Baldwin v. NewSearch
-
Carcerano v. GladdenSearch
-
to jury trial contemplated by Duncan also required a unanimous verdict, a question later decided in Apodaca v. OregonSearch
-
Elkanich v. UnitedSearch
-
States (a companion case with Williams v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 401 U. S. 646 (1971), holding Chimel v. CaliforniaSearch
-
caused by a reasonably based fear of actual vindictiveness on the part of a particular judge. Cf. North Carolina v. PearceSearch
-
U. S. 719 (1968) (held retroactive in Berger v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Bruton v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 391 U. S. 123 (1968) (held retroactive in Roberts v. RussellSearch
-
See Johnson v. NewSearch
-
Jersey, 384 U. S. 719 (1966). See also Stovall v. DennoSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial