Citation network
United States Vs. Bishop
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 29, 1973
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 346 (1973) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. BishopSearch
-
U.S. 346 (1973) United States v. BishopSearch
-
particularly Abdul v. UnitedSearch
-
A. The Ninth Circuit rule appears to have been evolved from language in this Court's opinion in Spies v. UnitedSearch
-
as we have said, is a word of many meanings, its construction often being influenced by its context. United States v. MurdockSearch
-
his conviction was reversed. On retrial, he was again convicted. He appealed, and the judgment was affirmed. Abdul v. UnitedSearch
-
tax felonies and tax misdemeanors, a distinction also inconsistent with prior decisions of this Court. In Berra v. UnitedSearch
-
the Berra facts were presented to the Court again in Sansone v. UnitedSearch
-
We continue to recognize that context is important in the quest for the word's meaning. See United States v. MurdockSearch
-
United States v. VitielloSearch
-
Sansone, 30 U.S. at 30 U. S. 353 . See James v. UnitedSearch
-
McCarthy v. UnitedSearch
-
is not met, therefore, if a taxpayer has relied in good faith on a prior decision of this Court. James v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 366 U.S. at 366 U. S. 221 -222. Cf. Lambert v. CaliforniaSearch
-
was not required or proper, for, in the federal system, it is not the function of the jury to set the penalty. Berra v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Compare United States v. VitielloSearch
-
and 7203), and Haner v. UnitedSearch
-
where the Ninth Circuit analysis was rejected, with United States v. FaheySearch
-
Martin v. UnitedSearch
-
Abdul v. UnitedSearch
-
and 7203 of the 1954 Code). See also Janko v. UnitedSearch
-
Lumetta v. UnitedSearch
-
Escobar v. UnitedSearch
-
have compounded the confusion. See n 8, infra. Cf. United States v. LachmannSearch
-
United States v. HaseltineSearch
-
United States v. FaheySearch
-
Eustis v. UnitedSearch
-
Edwards v. UnitedSearch
-
a) of the 1939 Code to income tax returns was not contested in Berra v. UnitedSearch
-
Achilli v. UnitedSearch
-
applicable to income tax violations. Sansone v. UnitedSearch
-
See United States v. MingSearch
-
United States v. MatoskySearch
-
United States v. SchipaniSearch
-
This Court may be somewhat responsible for this imprecision because a similar analysis was employed in Spies v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. BishopSearch
-
Spies v. UnitedSearch
-
Court. In Berra v. UnitedSearch
-
Sansone v. UnitedSearch
-
See United States v. MurdockSearch
-
See James v. UnitedSearch
-
Court. James v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. Lambert v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Berra v. UnitedSearch
-
and Haner v. UnitedSearch
-
Janko v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. United States v. LachmannSearch
-
United States v. MurdockSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial