Citation network
Schneckloth Vs. Bustamonte
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 29, 1973
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 218 (1973) U.S. Supreme Court Schneckloth v. BustamonteSearch
-
U.S. 218 (1973) Schneckloth v. BustamonteSearch
-
Katz v. UnitedSearch
-
Coolidge v. NewSearch
-
to the requirements of both a warrant and probable cause is a search that is conducted pursuant to consent. Davis v. UnitedSearch
-
Zap v. UniteSearch
-
People v. MichaelSearch
-
On appeal, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, relying on its prior decisions in Cipres v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 343 F.2d 95, and Schoep v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
The respondent concedes that a search conducted pursuant to a valid consent is constitutionally permissible. In Katz v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 389 U.S. at 389 U. S. 358 , and more recently in Vale v. LouisianaSearch
-
S. 30 , 399 U. S. 35 , we recognized that a search authorized by consent is wholly valid. See also Davis v. UnitedSearch
-
Zap v. UnitedSearch
-
Bumper v. NorthSearch
-
Carolina, 391 U. S. 543 , 391 U. S. 548 . See also Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
Amos v. UnitedSearch
-
s knowledge is only one factor to be taken into account in assessing the voluntariness of a consent. See, e.g., People v. TreymayneSearch
-
People v. RobertsSearch
-
of a defendant's confession for purposes of the Fourteenth Amendment. Almost 40 years ago, in Brown v. MississippiSearch
-
Amendment. In some 30 different cases decided during the era that intervened between Brown and Escobedo v. IllinoisSearch
-
is the acknowledged need for police questioning as a tool for the effective enforcement of criminal laws. See Culombe v. ConnecticutSearch
-
escape prosecution, and many crimes would go unsolved. In short, the security of all would be diminished. Haynes v. WashingtonSearch
-
U. S. 199 , 361 U. S. 206 -207. See also Culombe v. ConnecticutSearch
-
of the interrogation. Some of the factors taken into account have included the youth of the accused, e.g., Haley v. OhioSearch
-
his lack of education, e.g., Payne v. ArkansasSearch
-
or his low intelligence, e.g., Fikes v. AlabamaSearch
-
the lack of any advice to the accused of his constitutional rights, e.g., Davis v. NorthSearch
-
the length of detention, e.g., Chambers v. FloridaSearch
-
the repeated and prolonged nature of the questioning, e.g., Ashcraft v. TennesseeSearch
-
and the use of physical punishment such as the deprivation of food or sleep, e.g., Reck v. PateSearch
-
the psychological impact on the accused, and evaluated the legal significance of how the accused reacted. Culombe v. ConnecticutSearch
-
each reflected a careful scrutiny of all the surrounding circumstances. See Miranda v. ArizonaSearch
-
of an accused's responses, they were not, in and of themselves, determinative. See, e.g., Davis v. NorthSearch
-
police intrusion against which the Fourth Amendment is directed. In the words of the classic admonition in Boyd v. UnitedSearch
-
of a trial where, assisted by counsel if he chooses, a defendant is informed of his trial rights. Cf. Boykin v. AlabamaSearch
-
where, in Miranda v. ArizonaSearch
-
of each case that is evidenced in our prior decisions involving consent searches. For example, in Davis v. UnitedSearch
-
Id. at 328 U. S. 593 -594. See also Zap v. UnitedSearch
-
a claim of lawful authority -- then we have found the consent invalid and the search unreasonable. See, e.g., Bumper v. NorthSearch
-
Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
Amos v. PageSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Schneckloth v. BustamonteSearch
-
Davis v. UnitedSearch
-
Cipres v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial