Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Wardius Vs. Oregon

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 11, 1973

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

26 entries 1 linked 25 unlinked
Show
  1. Gideon Vs. Wainwright US Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1963
  2. U.S. 470 (1973) U.S. Supreme Court Wardius v. Oregon
    Search
  3. U.S. 470 (1973) Wardius v. Oregon
    Search
  4. rule to reciprocal discovery. In Williams v. Florida
    Search
  5. Process Clause has little to say regarding the amount of discovery which the parties must be afforded, but cf. Brady v. Maryland
    Search
  6. not suggest that the Due Process Clause, of its own force, requires Oregon to adopt such provisions. Cf. United States v. Augenblick
    Search
  7. Cicenia v. Laga
    Search
  8. Oregon's rule is facially invalid, we express no view as to whether a valid rule could be so enforced. Cf. Williams v. Florida
    Search
  9. when the lack of reciprocity interferes with the defendant's ability to secure a fair trial. See, e.g., Washington v. Texas
    Search
  10. State v. Kelsaw
    Search
  11. rights to view written statements made by state witnesses and by the defendant, in the hands of the police. See State v. Foster
    Search
  12. Cf. State v. Kelsaw
    Search
  13. s federal claims provides convincing proof that the judgment does not rest on adequate state grounds. See Warden v. Hayden
    Search
  14. Williams v. Florida
    Search
  15. The State cites us to State v. Kelsaw
    Search
  16. even this limited reciprocity would be granted. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, concurring in the result. In Williams v. Florida
    Search
  17. the advantage that inheres in a government prosecution. It is not for the Court to change that balance. See Williams v. Florida
    Search
  18. U.S. Supreme Court Wardius v. Oregon
    Search
  19. In Williams v. Florida
    Search
  20. Brady v. Maryland
    Search
  21. Cf. United States v. Augenblick
    Search
  22. Cf. Williams v. Florida
    Search
  23. Washington v. Texas
    Search
  24. See State v. Foster
    Search
  25. See Warden v. Hayden
    Search
  26. See Williams v. Florida
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial