Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

White Vs. Weiser

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 18, 1973

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

44 entries 9 linked 35 unlinked
Show
  1. Kirkpatrick Vs. Preisler US Supreme Court · Apr 07, 1969
  2. Burns Vs. Richardson US Supreme Court · Apr 25, 1966
  3. Reynolds Vs. Sims US Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1964
  4. Davis Vs. Mann US Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1964
  5. Roman Vs. Sincock US Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1964
  6. Ely Vs. Klahr US Supreme Court · Jun 07, 1971
  7. Taylor Vs. Mckeithen US Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1972
  8. Wesberry Vs. Sanders US Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1964
  9. Wells Vs. Rockefeller US Supreme Court · Apr 07, 1969
  10. U.S. 783 (1973) U.S. Supreme Court White v. Weiser
    Search
  11. U.S. 783 (1973) White v. Weiser
    Search
  12. Although the percentage deviations in S.B. 1 are smaller than those invalidated in Kirkpatrick v. Preisler
    Search
  13. U. S. 526 , and Wells v. Rockefeller
    Search
  14. way that minimizes the number of contests between present incumbents does not of itself establish invidiousness, Burns v. Richardson
    Search
  15. various depositions. The next day, the court announced its decision. Relying upon this Court's decision in Kirkpatrick v. Preisler
    Search
  16. was elucidated in Wesberry v. Sanders
    Search
  17. U. S. 1 (1964), and in Kirkpatrick v. Preisler
    Search
  18. Wells v. Rockefeller
    Search
  19. U. S. 73 , 384 U. S. 89 n. 16 (1966). Cf. Gaffney v. Cummings
    Search
  20. people, we are not inclined to disturb Kirkpatrick and Wells. This is particularly so in light of Mahan v. Howell
    Search
  21. over legislative reapportionment. See Maryland Committee for Fair Representation v. Tawes
    Search
  22. Sixty-seventh Minnesota State Senate v. Beens
    Search
  23. has sharp political impact and inevitably political decisions must be made by those charged with the task. See Gaffney v. Cummings
    Search
  24. U.S. at 384 U. S. 89 n. 16. Cf. Gaffney v. Cummings
    Search
  25. that the legislature might properly consider population changes in devising a redistricting plan. In Kirkpatrick v. Preisler
    Search
  26. THE CHIEF JUSTICE and MR. JUSTICE REHNQUIST join, concurring. Had I been a member of the Court when Kirkpatrick v. Preisler
    Search
  27. U. S. 526 (1969), and Wells v. Rockefeller
    Search
  28. adversely on the soundness, as I view it, of the dissenting perceptions. Indeed, the Court's recent opinions in Mahan v. Howell
    Search
  29. U. S. 315 (1973), Gaffney v. Cummings
    Search
  30. ante p. 412 U. S. 735 , and White v. Regester
    Search
  31. Kirkpatrick v. Preisler
    Search
  32. U. S. 526 , 394 U. S. 530 -531 (1969). See also Wells v. Rockefeller
    Search
  33. Fair Representation v. Tawes
    Search
  34. U.S. Supreme Court White v. Weiser
    Search
  35. and Wells v. Rockefeller
    Search
  36. Cf. Gaffney v. Cummings
    Search
  37. of Mahan v. Howell
    Search
  38. Fair Representation v. Tawes
    Search
  39. See Gaffney v. Cummings
    Search
  40. In Kirkpatrick v. Preisler
    Search
  41. and White v. Regester
    Search
  42. Whitcomb v. Chavis
    Search
  43. Mahan v. Howell
    Search
  44. Gaffney v. Cummings
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial