Citation network
United States Vs. Scrap
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 18, 1973
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 669 (1973) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. SCRAPSearch
-
U.S. 669 (1973) United States v. StudentsSearch
-
had standing to sue. The court held that its power to grant an injunction was not barred by Arrow Transportation Co. v. SouthernSearch
-
Administrative Procedure Act to withstand a motion to dismiss on the ground of lack of standing to sue. Sierra Club v. MortonSearch
-
id. at 195, and distinguished our recent decision in Sierra Club v. MortonSearch
-
the court found that its power to grant an injunction was not barred by our decision in Arrow Transportation Co. v. SouthernSearch
-
Page 412 U. S. 684 were vague, unsubstantiated, and insufficient under our recent decision in Sierra Club v. MortonSearch
-
allegations insufficient. Page 412 U. S. 686 Relying upon our prior decisions in Data Processing Service v. CampSearch
-
U. S. 150 , and Barlow v. CollinsSearch
-
across the Nation could be adversely affected by major governmental actions. See, e.g., Environmental Defense Fund v. HardinSearch
-
Reade v. EwingSearch
-
F.Supp. at 197, it concluded that our decision in Arrow Transportation Co. v. SouthernSearch
-
the courts had been asked to enjoin rates during the statutory seven-month period. See, e.g., M. C. Kiser Co. v. CentralSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Freeport Sulphur Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Bison S.S. Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
Luckenbach S.S. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Carlsen v. UnitedSearch
-
had held that they were without power to compel the Commission to grant a rate suspension. See, e.g., Bison S.S. Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
Freeport Sulphur Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
on the decisions of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Calvert Cliffs' Coordinating Comm. v. AtomicSearch
-
Energy Comm'n, 146 U.S.App.D.C. 33, 449 F.2d 1109, and Committee for Nuclear Responsibility, Inc. v. SeaborgSearch
-
if an agency has complied with NEPA, and to grant equitable relief if it has not, cf. Arrow Transportation Co. v. SouthernSearch
-
U.S. at 372 U. S. 668 . As the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit explained in Port of New York Authority v. UnitedSearch
-
Together with No. 72-562, Aberdeen & Rockfish Railroad Co. et al. v. StudentsSearch
-
are questions not raised here. No party now maintains that these cases are moot. Cf. Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. ICCSearch
-
to be vindicated by plaintiffs with no more at stake in the outcome of an action than a fraction of a vote, see Baker v. CarrSearch
-
fine and costs, see McGowan v. MarylandSearch
-
poll tax, Harper v. VirginiaSearch
-
assessment commonly made in suspension orders. See, e.g., the suspension orders quoted in Naph-Sol Refining Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Oscar Mayer & Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
its February 1 order that the surcharge was not considered a prescribed rate within the meaning of Arizona Grocery Co. v. AtchisonSearch
-
rate. Moss v. CABSearch
-
See Greene County Planning Board v. FPCSearch
-
Calvert Cliffs' Coordinating Comm. v. AtomicSearch
-
City of New York v. UnitedSearch
-
Cohen v. PriceSearch
-
Arrow Transportation Co. v. SouthernSearch
-
by the Commission whether or not to suspend rates is not subject to judicial review. See Port of New York Authority v. UnitedSearch
-
M. C. Kiser Co. v. CentralSearch
-
that the appellees view as broad enough to encompass alleged noncompliance with NEPA. See Naph-Sol Refining Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Long Island R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
as to my posture, I add a few words. For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Sierra Club v. MortonSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. SCRAPSearch
-
United States v. StudentsSearch
-
Data Processing Service v. CampSearch
-
and Barlow v. CollinsSearch
-
Environmental Defense Fund v. HardinSearch
-
Nuclear Responsibility, Inc. v. SeaborgSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial