Citation network
Cady Vs. Dombrowski
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 21, 1973
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Distinguished
-
U.S. 433 (1973) U.S. Supreme Court Cady v. DombrowskiSearch
-
U.S. 433 (1973) Cady v. DombrowskiSearch
-
was standard police procedure to protect the public from a weapon's possibly falling into improper hands. Preston v. UnitedSearch
-
Harris v. UnitedSearch
-
first-degree murder of Herbert McKinney and sentenced to life imprisonment. The conviction was upheld on appeal, State v. DombrowskiSearch
-
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit reversed, holding that one of the searches was unconstitutional under Preston v. UnitedSearch
-
State v. DombrowskiSearch
-
Camara v. MunicipalSearch
-
Court, 387 U. S. 523 , 387 U. S. 528 -529 (1967). See Coolidge v. NewSearch
-
U. S. 42 , 399 U. S. 52 (1970). See Carroll v. PageSearch
-
U. S. 440 United States, 267 U. S. 132 , 267 U. S. 153 -154 (1925). In Cooper v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
suggest that this branch of the law is something less than a seamless web. Since this Court's decision in Mapp v. OhioSearch
-
U. S. 643 (1961), which overruled Wolf v. ColoradoSearch
-
involves the detection or investigation of crimes unrelated to the operation of a vehicle. Cases such as Carroll v. UnitedSearch
-
States, supra, and Brinegar v. UnitedSearch
-
searches of automobiles by federal officers was concerned, was the vagrant and mobile nature of the former, Carroll v. UnitedSearch
-
Brinegar v. UnitedSearch
-
Coolidge v. NewSearch
-
s being removed Page 413 U. S. 442 or evidence in it destroyed were remote, if not nonexistent. See Harris v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 390 U. S. 234 (1968) (District of Columbia police), Cooper v. CaliforniaSearch
-
of evidence, fruits, or instrumentalities of a crime, or contraband. Cf. United States v. BiswellSearch
-
The Court of Appeals relied, and respondent now relies, primarily on Preston v. UnitedSearch
-
for the proposition that the search challenged there could not be justified as one incident to an arrest. See Chambers v. MaroneySearch
-
that the instant case is controlled by principles Page 413 U. S. 445 that may be extrapolated from Harris v. UnitedSearch
-
States, supra, and Cooper v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Thunderbird was not parked adjacent Page 413 U. S. 447 to the dwelling place of the owner, as in Coolidge v. NewSearch
-
means does not, by itself, render the search unreasonable. Cf. Chambers v. MaroneySearch
-
in those cases where a warrant is not required. Very little that has been said in our previous decisions, see Cooper v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Harris v. UnitedSearch
-
Chambers v. MaroneySearch
-
valid because the entire car had been validly seized as evidence and impounded pursuant to a valid warrant, cf. Harris v. UnitedSearch
-
search of the back seat of this car, located as it was in an open field, required a search warrant at all. See Hester v. UnitedSearch
-
of privacy, with the specific intent of discovering evidence of a crime, constitutes a search. Compare Haerr v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 240 F.2d 533 (CA5 1957), with District of Columbia v. LittleSearch
-
U.S.App.D.C. 242, 178 F.2d 13 (1949), aff'd on other grounds, 339 U. S. 1 (1950). But see Camara v. MunicipalSearch
-
petitioner relies on our decision in Harris v. UnitedSearch
-
Fourth Amendment unless within one of the few specifically established and well-delineated exceptions. Almeida-Sanchez v. UnitedSearch
-
Katz v. UnitedSearch
-
the vehicle can be quickly moved out of the locality or jurisdiction in which the warrant must be sought. Carroll v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 267 U. S. 132 , 267 U. S. 153 (1925). See also Coolidge v. NewSearch
-
Dyke v. TaylorSearch
-
is simply irrelevant. Coolidge v. NewSearch
-
Carroll v. UnitedSearch
-
Another established exception to the warrant requirement is a search incident to a valid arrest. Chimel v. CaliforniaSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Cady v. DombrowskiSearch
-
Preston v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial