Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

United States Vs. Ash

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 21, 1973

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

75 entries 5 linked 70 unlinked
Show
  1. Brady Vs. Maryland US Supreme Court · May 13, 1963
  2. Mooney Vs. Holohan US Supreme Court · Jan 21, 1935
  3. Miller Vs. Pate US Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1967
  4. United States Vs. Wade US Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1967
    Distinguished
  5. Stovall Vs. Denno US Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1967
    Relied / Followed
  6. U.S. 300 (1973) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Ash
    Search
  7. U.S. 300 (1973) United States v. Ash
    Search
  8. he might be misled by his lack of familiarity with the law or overpowered by his professional adversary. United States v. Wade
    Search
  9. displays conducted in May, 1968, before the trial. The majority relied on this Court's lineup cases, United States v. Wade
    Search
  10. U. S. 218 (1967), and Gilbert v. California
    Search
  11. U. S. 263 (1967), and on Stovall v. Denno
    Search
  12. between the purposes of the Sixth Amendment guarantee and the risks of a photographic identification. In Powell v. Alabama
    Search
  13. could consult counsel only on legal questions that the accused proposed to the court. See Powell v. Alabama
    Search
  14. is available to those in need of its assistance. See, for example, Gideon v. Wainwright
    Search
  15. U. S. 335 , 372 U. S. 344 -345 (1963), and Argersinger v. Hamlin
    Search
  16. resulted with the creation of a professional prosecuting official. Mr. Justice Black, writing for the Court in Johnson v. Zerbst
    Search
  17. birth initially to the right itself. Recent cases demonstrate the historical method of this expansion. In Hamilton v. Alabama
    Search
  18. U. S. 52 (1961), and in White v. Maryland
    Search
  19. was confronted with the procedural system and was required, with definite consequences, to enter a plea. In Massiah v. United
    Search
  20. authorities who obtained, by ruse and in the absence of defense counsel, incriminating statements. In Coleman v. Alabama
    Search
  21. and could have sheltered him from the overreaching of the prosecution. 377 U.S. at 377 U. S. 205 . Cf. Miranda v. Arizona
    Search
  22. present his version effectively without giving up his privilege against compulsory self-incrimination. United States v. Wade
    Search
  23. confrontation is conducted in the absence of counsel. Judge Friendly, writing for the Second Circuit in United States v. Bennett
    Search
  24. None of the classical analyses of the assistance to be given by counsel, Justice Sutherland's in Powell v. Alabama
    Search
  25. and Justice Black's in Johnson v. Page
    Search
  26. U. S. 317 Zerbst . . . and Gideon v. Wainwright
    Search
  27. has Page 413 U. S. 320 recognized that improved procedures can minimize the dangers of suggestion. Simmons v. United
    Search
  28. Berger v. United
    Search
  29. U. S. 87 -88 (1963). If that safeguard fails, review remains available under due process standards. See Giglio v. United
    Search
  30. U. S. 284 (1973). These same safeguard apply to misuse of photographs. See Simmons v. United
    Search
  31. respondent Ash has urged us to examine this photographic display under the due process standard enunciated in Simmons v. United
    Search
  32. F.2d 888, 898-900 (CA2), cert. denied sub nom. Haywood v. United
    Search
  33. Reed v. Anderson
    Search
  34. United States v. Collins
    Search
  35. United States v. Balard
    Search
  36. United States v. Serio
    Search
  37. United States v. Robinson
    Search
  38. United States v. Long
    Search
  39. Allen v. Rhay
    Search
  40. McGee v. United
    Search
  41. The en banc decision of the Third Circuit in Anderson overruled in part a panel decision in United States v. Zeiler
    Search
  42. state courts. The majority view, as in the courts of appeals, rejects the claimed right to counsel. See, e.g., McGhee v. State
    Search
  43. State v. Yehling
    Search
  44. People v. Lawrence
    Search
  45. Reed v. State
    Search
  46. People v. Holiday
    Search
  47. Baldwin v. State
    Search
  48. Commonwealth v. Ross
    Search
  49. Stevenson v. State
    Search
  50. State v. Brookins
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial