Citation network
Sugarman Vs. Dougall
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 25, 1973
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U.S. 634 (1973) U.S. Supreme Court Sugarman v. DougallSearch
-
U.S. 634 (1973) Sugarman v. DougallSearch
-
was unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment, placed primary reliance on this Court's decisions in Graham v. RichardsonSearch
-
U. S. 365 (1971), and Takahashi v. FishSearch
-
Comm'n, 334 U. S. 410 (1948), and, to an extent, on Purdy & Fitzpatrick v. StateSearch
-
New York Post Corp. v. MosesSearch
-
III It is established, of course, that an alien is entitled to the shelter of the Equal Protection Clause. Graham v. RichardsonSearch
-
Wong Wing v. UnitedSearch
-
Emphasis is placed on our decision in United Public Workers v. MitchellSearch
-
review of statutes that treat aliens differently from citizens requires a greater degree of precision. In Graham v. RichardsonSearch
-
are a prime example of a 'discrete and insular' minority ( see United States v. CaroleneSearch
-
Takahashi v. FishSearch
-
Perotta v. GregorySearch
-
to do with the formulation and execution of state policy. Understandably relying on this Court's decisions in Crane v. NewSearch
-
York, 239 U. S. 195 (1915), Heim v. McCallSearch
-
U. S. 175 (1915), and Clarke v. DeckebachSearch
-
People v. CraneSearch
-
hatever is a privilege, rather than a right, may be made dependent upon citizenship.' People v. CraneSearch
-
U.S. at 403 U. S. 374 . See also Sherbert v. VernerSearch
-
a). See Astrup v. ImmigrationSearch
-
restriction is in conflict with Congress' comprehensive regulation of immigration and naturalization. See Graham v. RichardsonSearch
-
Boyd v. ThayerSearch
-
U. S. 135 , 143 U. S. 161 (1892). See Luther v. BordenSearch
-
voter qualifications, is not wholly immune from scrutiny under the Equal Protection Clause. See, for example, Kramer v. UnionSearch
-
of a State's historical power to exclude aliens from participation in its democratic political institutions, Pope v. WilliamsSearch
-
s voting rights decisions is the notion that citizenship is a permissible criterion for limiting such rights. Kramer v. UnionSearch
-
Harper v. VirginiaSearch
-
Lassiter v. NorthamptonSearch
-
in the absence of overriding treaties, limit the right of noncitizens to exploit a State's natural resources, McCready v. VirginiaSearch
-
U. S. 391 (1877), Patsone v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
to inherit real property, Hauenstein v. LynhamSearch
-
U. S. 483 (1880), Blythe v. HinckleySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial