Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Csc Vs. Letter Carriers

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 25, 1973

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

45 entries 12 linked 33 unlinked
Show
  1. Dunn Vs. Blumstein US Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1972
  2. Bullock Vs. Carter US Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1972
  3. Jenness Vs. Fortson US Supreme Court · Jun 21, 1971
  4. Williams Vs. Rhodes US Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1968
  5. United States Vs. Harriss US Supreme Court · Jun 07, 1954
  6. Mills Vs. Alabama US Supreme Court · May 23, 1966
  7. Monitor Patriot Co. Vs. Roy US Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1971
  8. United Public Workers Vs. Mitchell US Supreme Court · Feb 10, 1947
  9. Rosario Vs. Rockefeller US Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1973
  10. Law Students Research Council Vs. Wadmond US Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1971
    Relied / Followed
  11. Dombrowski Vs. Pfister US Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1965
  12. Naacp Vs. Button US Supreme Court · Jan 14, 1963
  13. CSC v. Letter
    Search
  14. Carriers - 413 U.S. 548 (1973) U.S. Supreme Court CSC v. Letter
    Search
  15. Carriers, 413 U.S. 548 (1973) United States Civil Service Commission v. National
    Search
  16. the constitutionality of which was left open in United Public Workers v. Mitchell
    Search
  17. by the Supreme Court of the United States when it endorsed the objectives of the Hatch Act. United Public Workers v. Mitchell
    Search
  18. Id. at 580. The District Court ruled, however, that United Public Workers v. Mitchell
    Search
  19. or beliefs, or to interfere with or influence anyone's vote at the polls. But, as the Court held in Pickering v. Board
    Search
  20. right to associate nor the right to participate in political activities is absolute in any event. See, e.g., Rosario v. Rockefeller
    Search
  21. ourselves in rejecting the claim that the Act is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. Law Students Research Council v. Wadmond
    Search
  22. Gooding v. Wilson
    Search
  23. and (12), does not, in our view, make the statute substantially overbroad, and so invalid on its face. Broadrick v. Oklahoma
    Search
  24. Broadrick v. Oklahoma
    Search
  25. Northern Virginia Regional Park Authority v. U.S
    Search
  26. Fishkin v. U.S
    Search
  27. Kearney v. Macy
    Search
  28. Engelhardt v. U.S
    Search
  29. standard which United Public Page 413 U. S. 597 Workers v. Mitchell
    Search
  30. See Perry v. Sindermann
    Search
  31. a religious cause. Free discussion of governmental affairs is basic in our constitutional system. Sweezy v. New
    Search
  32. has a peculiar evil, the evil of creating chilling effects which deter the exercise of those freedoms. Dombrowski v. Pfister
    Search
  33. U. S. 479 , 380 U. S. 486 . As we stated in NAACP v. Button
    Search
  34. be unconstitutionally discharged for sending a letter to a newspaper that criticized the school authorities. Pickering v. Board
    Search
  35. We followed the same course in Wood v. Georgia
    Search
  36. U.S. Supreme Court CSC v. Letter
    Search
  37. United States Civil Service Commission v. National
    Search
  38. of the Hatch Act. United Public Workers v. Mitchell
    Search
  39. Pickering v. Board
    Search
  40. Gooding v. Wilson
    Search
  41. Broadrick v. Oklahoma
    Search
  42. Northern Virginia Regional Park Authority v. U.S
    Search
  43. Workers v. Mitchell
    Search
  44. Sweezy v. New
    Search
  45. Wood v. Georgia
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial