Citation network
Roaden Vs. Kentucky
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 25, 1973
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 496 (1973) U.S. Supreme Court Roaden v. KentuckySearch
-
U.S. 496 (1973) Roaden v. KentuckySearch
-
expression, whether by books or films, calls for a higher hurdle in the evaluation of reasonableness. Lee Art Theatre v. VirginiaSearch
-
Marcus v. SearchSearch
-
film was properly seized incident to a lawful arrest, distinguishing the holdings of this Court in A Quantity of Books v. KansasSearch
-
U. S. 205 (1964), and Marcus v. SearchSearch
-
S.W.2d at 815. It also distinguished Lee Art Theatre v. VirginiaSearch
-
at 816. The Court of Appeals relied on a decision of a federal three-judge Page 413 U. S. 501 court in Hosey v. CitySearch
-
The Court of Appeals specifically declined to follow a decision by another federal three-judge court in Ledesma v. PerezSearch
-
in one setting may be unreasonable in a different setting or with respect to another kind of material. Cf. Coolidge v. NewSearch
-
when a court appraises the reasonableness of the seizure under Fourth or Fourteenth Amendment standards. Marcus v. SearchSearch
-
Id. at 367 U. S. 732 . The sense of this holding was reaffirmed in A Quantity of Books v. KansasSearch
-
Id. at 378 U. S. 211 -212. Lee Art Theatre v. VirginiaSearch
-
Theatre is to be found in the nature of the materials seized and the setting in which they were taken. See Stanford v. TexasSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
As we stated in Stanford v. TexasSearch
-
exactitude when the 'things' are books, and the basis for their seizure is the ideas which they contain. See Marcus v. SearchSearch
-
A Quantity of Books v. KansasSearch
-
arrest might justify the seizure of weapons, or other evidence or instruments of crime, without a warrant. Cf. Chimel v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Preston v. UnitedSearch
-
See Chambers v. MaroneySearch
-
U. S. 42 , 399 U. S. 47 -51 (1970). Cf. Carroll v. UnitedSearch
-
See Heller v. NewSearch
-
We vacated the judgment in Hosey v. CitySearch
-
we did not reach the merits. Hosey v. CitySearch
-
of Jackson, 401 U.S. 987 (1971). We also vacated the judgment in Ledesma v. PerezSearch
-
again on the grounds of noninterference with state criminal proceedings prior to adjudications by state courts. Perez v. LedesmaSearch
-
In Stanford v. TexasSearch
-
does not mean an adversary proceeding is needed before seizure, since a warrant may be issued ex parte. Heller v. NewSearch
-
Counsel for Kentucky, together with counsel for New York in Heller v. NewSearch
-
view, unconstitutionally overbroad, and therefore invalid on its face. See my dissent in Paris Adult Theatre I v. SlatonSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Roaden v. KentuckySearch
-
Lee Art Theatre v. VirginiaSearch
-
and Marcus v. SearchSearch
-
Hosey v. CitySearch
-
Ledesma v. PerezSearch
-
Cf. Coolidge v. NewSearch
-
See Stanford v. TexasSearch
-
Stanford v. TexasSearch
-
See Marcus v. SearchSearch
-
Cf. Chimel v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Cf. Carroll v. UnitedSearch
-
Heller v. NewSearch
-
Paris Adult Theatre I v. SlatonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial