Citation network
Holtzman Vs. Schlesinger
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Aug 01, 1973
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 1304 (1973) U.S. Supreme Court Holtzman v. SchlesingerSearch
-
U.S. 1304 (1973) Holtzman v. SchlesingerSearch
-
Mitchell v. LairdSearch
-
Orlando v. LairdSearch
-
F.2d 1039, 1042 (CA2 1971). Cf. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSearch
-
There is, to be sure, no doubt that I have the power, as a single Circuit Justice, to dissolve the stay. See Meredith v. FairSearch
-
with the greatest of caution, and should be reserved for exceptional circumstances. Cf. Aberdeen & Rockfish R. Co. v. SCRAPSearch
-
on which side the risk of irreparable injury weighs most heavily. See, e.g., Long Beach Federal Sav. & Loan Assn. v. FederalSearch
-
Board of Education v. TaylorSearch
-
Socialist Labor Party v. RhodesSearch
-
stayed where it is likely that four Members of this Court would vote to grant a writ of certiorari. See, e.g., Edwards v. NewSearch
-
Appalachian Power Co. v. AmericanSearch
-
McGee v. EymanSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
likely be impossible to preserve this controversy in its present form for ultimate review by this Court. Cf. O'Brien v. BrownSearch
-
when the losing party presents substantial contentions which are likely to prevail on the merits. See, e.g., O'Brien v. BrownSearch
-
Rosenberg v. UnitedSearch
-
Railway Express Agency v. UnitedSearch
-
Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. BrotherhoodSearch
-
ongoing war may present political questions which the federal courts lack jurisdiction to decide, see, e.g., DaCosta v. LairdSearch
-
may lack the power to dictate the form which congressional assent to war-making must take, see, e.g., Massachusetts v. LairdSearch
-
war-making, and that these standards are sufficient to make controversies concerning them justiciable. See Mitchell v. LairdSearch
-
DaCosta v. LairdSearch
-
Berk v. LairdSearch
-
years since those words were written alters that fundamental constitutional postulate. Cf. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSearch
-
a heavy responsibility to conscientiously reflect the views of his Brethren as best he perceives them, cf. Meredith v. FairSearch
-
own jurisdiction, is entitled to great weight. See, e.g., Page 414 U. S. 1315 United States ex rel. Knauff v. McGrathSearch
-
Breswick & Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
New York Times Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
lies in this dispute, as courts traditionally do when determining the appropriateness of a stay. See, e.g., O'Brien v. BrownSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Holtzman v. SchlesingerSearch
-
Cf. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSearch
-
See Meredith v. FairSearch
-
Cf. Aberdeen & Rockfish R. Co. v. SCRAPSearch
-
Long Beach Federal Sav. & Loan Assn. v. FederalSearch
-
Edwards v. NewSearch
-
Court. Cf. O'Brien v. BrownSearch
-
O'Brien v. BrownSearch
-
Massachusetts v. LairdSearch
-
See Mitchell v. LairdSearch
-
Meredith v. FairSearch
-
Knauff v. McGrathSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial