Citation network
United States Vs. Robinson
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 11, 1973
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Distinguished
- Distinguished
-
U.S. 218 (1973) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. RobinsonSearch
-
U.S. 218 (1973) United States v. RobinsonSearch
-
of the particular crime for which the arrest is made does not narrow the standards applicable to such a search. Terry v. OhioSearch
-
F.2d 1082 (1972). We granted certiorari, 410 U.S. 982 (1973), and set the case for argument together with Gustafson v. FloridaSearch
-
the rule requiring exclusion of evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment was first enunciated in Weeks v. UnitedSearch
-
Dillon v. O'BrienSearch
-
Id. at 392. Agnello v. UnitedSearch
-
as to the unqualified authority of the arresting authority to search the person of the arrestee. E.g., Carroll v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Marron v. UnitedSearch
-
Go-Bart Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Harris v. UnitedSearch
-
Trupiano v. UnitedSearch
-
Preston v. UnitedSearch
-
search in which heroin had been taken from the person of the defendant after his arrest on a weapons charge, in Adams v. WilliamsSearch
-
Id. at 407 U. S. 149 . Last Term, in Cupp v. MurphySearch
-
broadly stated rule, and the reasons for it, have been repeatedly affirmed in the decisions of this Court since Weeks v. UnitedSearch
-
limited frisk, reasonably believe and ascertain that the suspect has in his possession. While recognizing that Terry v. OhioSearch
-
to be obtained in a search of the arrestee, the court held that only a search for weapons could be justified. Terry v. OhioSearch
-
in part by the acknowledged necessity to protect the arresting officer from assault with a concealed weapon, Preston v. UnitedSearch
-
search, be strictly circumscribed by the exigencies Page 414 U. S. 228 which justify its initiation. Warden v. HaydenSearch
-
a stop-and-frisk search permissible without probable cause. The Court of Appeals also relied on language in Peters v. NewSearch
-
of an arrestee incident to his lawful arrest. While the language from Peters was quoted with approval in Chimel v. CaliforniaSearch
-
The History of English Law 582 (2d ed.1909). The issue was apparently litigated in the English courts in Dillon v. O'BrienSearch
-
Cox C.C. 245 (Exch.Ireland, 1887), cited in Weeks v. UnitedSearch
-
Cox C.C. at 250. Page 414 U. S. 231 Spalding v. PrestonSearch
-
represents an early holding in this country that evidence may be seized from one who is lawfully arrested. In Closson v. MorrisonSearch
-
and hold them until the prisoner should be discharged, or until they could be otherwise properly disposed of. Spalding v. PrestonSearch
-
Id. at 484-485. Page 414 U. S. 232 Similarly, in Holker v. HennesseySearch
-
People v. ChiaglesSearch
-
to take him into custody as it does on the need to preserve evidence on his person for later use at trial. Agnello v. UnitedSearch
-
Abel v. UnitedSearch
-
abusive characteristics which were held to violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment in Rochin v. CaliforniaSearch
-
probative of criminal conduct. Harris v. UnitedSearch
-
Adams v. WilliamsSearch
-
Bristow, Police Officer Shootings -- A Tactical Evaluation, 54 J.Crim.L.C. & P.S. 93 (1963), cited in Adams v. WilliamsSearch
-
This opinion also applies to No. 71-1669, Gustafson v. FloridaSearch
-
The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit aptly stated this rationale in Charles v. UnitedSearch
-
Perhaps the most basic of these was expressed by Mr. Justice Butler, speaking for a unanimous Court in Go-Bart Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Sibron v. NewSearch
-
U. S. 643 , 367 U. S. 647 Page 414 U. S. 239 (1961). See also Weeks v. UnitedSearch
-
and facilitation of concealment of heroin. II Mr. Justice Jackson, writing for the Court in Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
Coolidge v. NewSearch
-
to the right of search is required to be made by a neutral judicial officer before the search is conducted. See Katz v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial